+9 HBP vs +9 FAW EA9, which one should I use - Swordsman Class - WarpPortal Community Forums

Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

+9 HBP vs +9 FAW EA9, which one should I use


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 MournHaibara

MournHaibara

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 276 posts

Posted 18 April 2015 - 07:36 AM

I did a test. All other gears the same, +9 FAW EA9 do 2k more VP damage on same monster, but +9 HBP gives me 2 more aspd.

 

(I am 120S/100A, D, V/40I, L)

 

Theoretically +9HBP looks better. But when full buffed I can reach like 191 aspd with FAW, and HBP will give me 192/193. However because of many reasons (physical restriction on how fast human finger can press, the stupid hit lock system, how auto-guard works, etc) I found even I am at 193 aspd I can't cast VP at that same aspd level. So in this case maybe I should go with FAW?

 

What you guys think? I have a wakwak card, which one should I slot?


  • 0

#2 Kadelia

Kadelia

    Rainbow Sparkle, Go!

  • Members
  • 14312 posts
  • LocationVirginia, USA
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos/Renewal

Posted 18 April 2015 - 09:06 AM

If you need both aspd and ranged percent them hbp is doing more for you than a faw
  • 0

#3 MournHaibara

MournHaibara

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 276 posts

Posted 18 April 2015 - 09:18 AM

If you need both aspd and ranged percent them hbp is doing more for you than a faw

 

Is it there a big difference between VP at 191 aspd and 193 aspd?


  • 0

#4 Astralslayer

Astralslayer

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 519 posts
  • LocationFar Far away~~
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 18 April 2015 - 09:37 AM

Are you looking at the damage's speed or your character's speed? the animation speed might be "slow" but you're casting vp faster.

 

Also check the damage done by both garments. if the difference isnt that high, go for HBP since that makes you spam faster vp


  • 0

#5 Aknel

Aknel

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 154 posts
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:iro

Posted 18 April 2015 - 06:57 PM

Is it there a big difference between VP at 191 aspd and 193 aspd?


Normal attack? Yup. Only if your connection is not lagging.


Edited by Aknel, 20 April 2015 - 02:00 AM.

  • 0

#6 RaohSung

RaohSung

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 456 posts
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online

Posted 19 April 2015 - 05:33 AM

Dont use "Guard" lol...

From experience, i can spam VP + Pot in the same time more fluent if i have 193 compared to 190 or so.

Even if others (and the Wiki) is saying that there is no difference between 188 Comp. to 193... thats Bullsh!t, test both, VP Spam and Potting works better, try spamming pots, Mastellas or what ever + VP in the same time with 189/190 then with 193. You will see a big difference.


  • 1

#7 kasshin

kasshin

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 3686 posts
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 20 April 2015 - 09:32 AM

There's a big difference between 188 and 190 for VP, but after 190 it's less noticeable to me. I'd probably say 191/192 is still worth it but going for 193 for VP is probably pointless.

Some people here might be confused; we're talking about the vanishing point skill and not regular ctrl-click attacks (where every ASPD counts).

There are some people who might use third party programs for this type of thing but I'm not really sure if that's allowed in PVM / MVP (probably not). I'm pretty sure it's not allowed in WoE.
  • 1

#8 Lazaruce

Lazaruce

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 2171 posts
  • LocationLabyrinth Inside Forsaken Eternity (L.I.F.E)
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Thor

Posted 13 May 2015 - 07:38 AM

If you need both aspd and ranged percent them hbp is doing more for you than a faw

 

Wait , does this mean an EA9 FAW of Shooter will less damage than +9 HBP of Shooter?

I'm planning to make EA for my FAW but if that will be less productive , I'd rather have A Spell / Fatal / Fighting Spirit enchant if that's the case


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users