knight vs gladiator
#1
Posted 23 October 2010 - 01:49 PM
#2
Posted 23 October 2010 - 02:02 PM
which one is better knight or gladiator?
Basing this solely on numbers, Knights.
#3
Posted 23 October 2010 - 06:13 PM
#4
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:27 PM
#5
Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:44 PM
i second this.I like glads better because I'm a hipster!
I think i will enjoy a gladiator more than the knight i made in phase 1.
#6
Posted 24 October 2010 - 08:11 PM
Knight -
Pros:
- one of few classes with guard ability
- only class with impervious status
- high health and defense
- ground lock and air lock
Cons:
- weak damage (although changed post-patch, this may not apply anymore)
Gladiator -
Pros:
- high damage, leading to massive criticals
- can increase effectiveness of pots (great for PvE)
- high health
- better AoE skills
Cons:
- may find yourself out of usable skills early on in the game
In the end, a knight can beat a gladiator simply by stun-locking. But in a more dignified battle, a gladi can burn through a knight's hp like hot knife through butter if they get to pull off some moves (even worse if the gladi has a high critical rate).
#7
Posted 19 November 2010 - 05:25 PM
Edited by Paxon, 20 November 2010 - 09:58 AM.
#8
Posted 21 November 2010 - 01:36 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Z3t-eI_huQ&feature=player_embedded nuff said
I don't get what you're implying. No matter how hard you suck, running around constantly and spamming their easy-to-spam-and-land-moves will result in a win. Oddly enough, that has nothing to do with PvE!!!
PvE = Gladiators will always win. They have AoE. They have power. They have the 2nd highest defense and HP.
PvP = Knights. They're knights. Period.
Gladiators in PvP are also very easy to use if you don't lag(dem bears), but you won't be winning against any(most) knights or infiltrators.
Also, I don't see too many high leveled knights. It seems most folks make them (then fund them) THEN use them soley for PvPing. Which is what I would do too (if I sucked at PvP and cared about winning without trying), since knights are by far the worst class ever in terms of PvE damage. A healer out-damages them. What does that say?
Edited by Tundra, 21 November 2010 - 01:38 PM.
#9
Posted 21 November 2010 - 02:45 PM
I wasn't being seriousI don't get what you're implying. No matter how hard you suck, running around constantly and spamming their easy-to-spam-and-land-moves will result in a win. Oddly enough, that has nothing to do with PvE!!!
PvE = Gladiators will always win. They have AoE. They have power. They have the 2nd highest defense and HP.
PvP = Knights. They're knights. Period.
Gladiators in PvP are also very easy to use if you don't lag(dem bears), but you won't be winning against any(most) knights or infiltrators.
Also, I don't see too many high leveled knights. It seems most folks make them (then fund them) THEN use them soley for PvPing. Which is what I would do too (if I sucked at PvP and cared about winning without trying), since knights are by far the worst class ever in terms of PvE damage. A healer out-damages them. What does that say?
#10
Posted 21 November 2010 - 04:01 PM
I wasn't being serious
I thought you were. Because that pretty much sums up knights as a whole. :3c
#11
Posted 21 November 2010 - 04:32 PM
Were you saying I suckI thought you were. Because that pretty much sums up knights as a whole. :3c
#12
Posted 25 November 2010 - 01:53 PM
#13
Posted 25 November 2010 - 07:24 PM
#14
Posted 27 November 2010 - 08:41 AM
That assassin is terrible >_>
Aren't most of them terrible? Kind of like how most knights are terrible.
#15
Posted 29 November 2010 - 02:08 AM
A healer out-damages them. What does that say?
Shamen/invokers/monks or w.e u call them out dmg a whole lot of classes buddy... what does that say?
#16
Posted 29 November 2010 - 07:17 AM
Shamen/invokers/monks or w.e u call them out dmg a whole lot of classes buddy... what does that say?
That just says what I was implying - but now it's including other classes as apposed to just the warrior kind.
#17
Posted 29 November 2010 - 04:17 PM
What are some things I can fix?That assassin is terrible >_>
#18
Posted 29 November 2010 - 05:04 PM
-> Have high HP and Def.
-> Lacklustre in damage, though still have some sort of damamge capability.
-> Have block rates, as well as Parry to increase block rates.
-> In Paladin, have Time Reverse that allows more useage of skill, meaning more damage, but more mp wasted.
Gladiators:
-> High damage, decent hp and def.
-> Have a decent amount of aoes, though at times doesn't feel that they're reliable.
-> A little on the slow side in movement.
-> Slow normal x attack. Can be combined with Acceleration and Bloody Roar(Mrymidon or whatever it is called now.) seeing that it boosts just the normal attacks, Accel works in getting your attack speed up.
-> High damage output (in my opinion) after lv 51 when you get Wyvern Blade lv 2 when it can hit standing mobs.
I feel that knights are better, but I think Gladdys are just as great. =/ If you had lots of time, then you could try both out like me and deem which one you like better.
#19
Posted 29 November 2010 - 08:10 PM
#20
Posted 30 November 2010 - 11:21 AM
#21
Posted 01 December 2010 - 05:11 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users