knight vs gladiator - Warrior Class - WarpPortal Community Forums

Jump to content


Photo

knight vs gladiator


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 digi51

digi51

    I made it Off Topic

  • Members
  • 19 posts

Posted 23 October 2010 - 01:49 PM

which one is better knight or gladiator?
  • 0

#2 to0n

to0n

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1075 posts
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online

Posted 23 October 2010 - 02:02 PM

which one is better knight or gladiator?


Basing this solely on numbers, Knights.
  • 0

#3 digi51

digi51

    I made it Off Topic

  • Members
  • 19 posts

Posted 23 October 2010 - 06:13 PM

i agree
  • 0

#4 Kimimaro

Kimimaro

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 625 posts

Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:27 PM

I like glads better because I'm a hipster!
  • 0

#5 EmoCutt

EmoCutt

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1963 posts
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Draconis

Posted 23 October 2010 - 07:44 PM

I like glads better because I'm a hipster!

i second this.
I think i will enjoy a gladiator more than the knight i made in phase 1.
  • 0

#6 Lockunlimted

Lockunlimted

    I made it Off Topic

  • Members
  • 11 posts

Posted 24 October 2010 - 08:11 PM

more comprehensive rundown:

Knight -
Pros:
- one of few classes with guard ability
- only class with impervious status
- high health and defense
- ground lock and air lock

Cons:
- weak damage (although changed post-patch, this may not apply anymore)

Gladiator -
Pros:
- high damage, leading to massive criticals
- can increase effectiveness of pots (great for PvE)
- high health
- better AoE skills

Cons:
- may find yourself out of usable skills early on in the game

In the end, a knight can beat a gladiator simply by stun-locking. But in a more dignified battle, a gladi can burn through a knight's hp like hot knife through butter if they get to pull off some moves (even worse if the gladi has a high critical rate).
  • 0

#7 Paxon

Paxon

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 579 posts
  • LocationBehind you ^^
  • Playing:Dragon Saga
  • Server:I forgot which one

Posted 19 November 2010 - 05:25 PM

nuff said

Edited by Paxon, 20 November 2010 - 09:58 AM.

  • 0

#8 Tundra

Tundra

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 278 posts
  • Playing:Dragon Saga

Posted 21 November 2010 - 01:36 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Z3t-eI_huQ&feature=player_embedded nuff said


I don't get what you're implying. No matter how hard you suck, running around constantly and spamming their easy-to-spam-and-land-moves will result in a win. Oddly enough, that has nothing to do with PvE!!!

PvE = Gladiators will always win. They have AoE. They have power. They have the 2nd highest defense and HP.

PvP = Knights. They're knights. Period.

Gladiators in PvP are also very easy to use if you don't lag(dem bears), but you won't be winning against any(most) knights or infiltrators.

Also, I don't see too many high leveled knights. It seems most folks make them (then fund them) THEN use them soley for PvPing. Which is what I would do too (if I sucked at PvP and cared about winning without trying), since knights are by far the worst class ever in terms of PvE damage. A healer out-damages them. What does that say?

Edited by Tundra, 21 November 2010 - 01:38 PM.

  • 0

#9 Paxon

Paxon

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 579 posts
  • LocationBehind you ^^
  • Playing:Dragon Saga
  • Server:I forgot which one

Posted 21 November 2010 - 02:45 PM

I don't get what you're implying. No matter how hard you suck, running around constantly and spamming their easy-to-spam-and-land-moves will result in a win. Oddly enough, that has nothing to do with PvE!!!

PvE = Gladiators will always win. They have AoE. They have power. They have the 2nd highest defense and HP.

PvP = Knights. They're knights. Period.

Gladiators in PvP are also very easy to use if you don't lag(dem bears), but you won't be winning against any(most) knights or infiltrators.

Also, I don't see too many high leveled knights. It seems most folks make them (then fund them) THEN use them soley for PvPing. Which is what I would do too (if I sucked at PvP and cared about winning without trying), since knights are by far the worst class ever in terms of PvE damage. A healer out-damages them. What does that say?

I wasn't being serious
  • 0

#10 Tundra

Tundra

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 278 posts
  • Playing:Dragon Saga

Posted 21 November 2010 - 04:01 PM

I wasn't being serious


I thought you were. Because that pretty much sums up knights as a whole. :3c
  • 0

#11 Paxon

Paxon

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 579 posts
  • LocationBehind you ^^
  • Playing:Dragon Saga
  • Server:I forgot which one

Posted 21 November 2010 - 04:32 PM

I thought you were. Because that pretty much sums up knights as a whole. :3c

Were you saying I suck <_<
  • 0

#12 ApeKing

ApeKing

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 592 posts

Posted 25 November 2010 - 01:53 PM

That assassin is terrible >_>
  • 0

#13 Zxasde

Zxasde

    I made it Off Topic

  • Members
  • 44 posts

Posted 25 November 2010 - 07:24 PM

I say gladiator.
  • 0

#14 Tundra

Tundra

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 278 posts
  • Playing:Dragon Saga

Posted 27 November 2010 - 08:41 AM

That assassin is terrible >_>


Aren't most of them terrible? Kind of like how most knights are terrible.
  • 0

#15 PieIsGood

PieIsGood

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 299 posts

Posted 29 November 2010 - 02:08 AM

A healer out-damages them. What does that say?


Shamen/invokers/monks or w.e u call them out dmg a whole lot of classes buddy... what does that say?
  • 0

#16 Tundra

Tundra

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 278 posts
  • Playing:Dragon Saga

Posted 29 November 2010 - 07:17 AM

Shamen/invokers/monks or w.e u call them out dmg a whole lot of classes buddy... what does that say?


That just says what I was implying - but now it's including other classes as apposed to just the warrior kind.
  • 0

#17 Paxon

Paxon

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 579 posts
  • LocationBehind you ^^
  • Playing:Dragon Saga
  • Server:I forgot which one

Posted 29 November 2010 - 04:17 PM

That assassin is terrible >_>

What are some things I can fix?
  • 0

#18 DarkWyvern

DarkWyvern

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 368 posts
  • LocationOntario, Canada
  • Playing:Dragon Saga
  • Server:Vvyern

Posted 29 November 2010 - 05:04 PM

Knights:
-> Have high HP and Def.
-> Lacklustre in damage, though still have some sort of damamge capability.
-> Have block rates, as well as Parry to increase block rates.
-> In Paladin, have Time Reverse that allows more useage of skill, meaning more damage, but more mp wasted.

Gladiators:
-> High damage, decent hp and def.
-> Have a decent amount of aoes, though at times doesn't feel that they're reliable.
-> A little on the slow side in movement.
-> Slow normal x attack. Can be combined with Acceleration and Bloody Roar(Mrymidon or whatever it is called now.) seeing that it boosts just the normal attacks, Accel works in getting your attack speed up.
-> High damage output (in my opinion) after lv 51 when you get Wyvern Blade lv 2 when it can hit standing mobs.

I feel that knights are better, but I think Gladdys are just as great. =/ If you had lots of time, then you could try both out like me and deem which one you like better.
  • 0

#19 Chesticals

Chesticals

    I made it Off Topic

  • Members
  • 56 posts

Posted 29 November 2010 - 08:10 PM

I would go with a gladiator. There's more integrity and honor in doing that. If you're okay with sucking at PvE and having people hate you in PvP, then sure go with knight.
  • 1

#20 givi

givi

    I am New.

  • Members
  • 4 posts

Posted 30 November 2010 - 11:21 AM

эÑ?оÑ? сайÑ? не Ñ?еквиема?
  • 0

#21 ctlmo4

ctlmo4

    I am New.

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 01 December 2010 - 05:11 AM

I have a 53 level knight. If you don't have friend to play with you, knight is not a good choose.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users