NICE WOE. there isn't much lag.. gj WP team.! and.. to AEZIR congrats
Posted 08 September 2013 - 06:44 PM
For several weeks now, WP has been busy fixing and convincing us players to support the RO2's WOE system and yet.... First Official WOE was successful and the castle has been claimed by Aesir Guild and not even one Recognition was given by WP... I'm just curious Why?
a.) Is it because, the first Official WOE castle owner was not one of their l**d**s?
b.) They just don't care?
c.) They are just purely racist?
d.) They just don't know how to recognize Player's efforts and loyalty?
Note : These are purely hypothetical questions... no offense meant.
Edited by xGanelon, 08 September 2013 - 06:50 PM.
Posted 08 September 2013 - 07:01 PM
Discrimination op U.U'
For several weeks now, WP has been busy fixing and convincing us players to support the RO2's WOE system and yet.... First Official WOE was successful and the castle has been claimed by Aesir Guild and not even one Recognition was given by WP... I'm just curious Why?
a.) Is it because, the first Official WOE castle owner was not one of their l**d**s?
b.) They just don't care?
c.) They are just purely racist?
d.) They just don't know how to recognize Player's efforts and loyalty?
Note : These are purely hypothetical questions... no offense meant.
Posted 08 September 2013 - 07:07 PM
NICE WOE. there isn't much lag.. gj WP team.! and.. to AEZIR congrats
Thank you so much Clinkz ! Congratz for the guilds that participated in woe, all the guilds did a great job, it was really fun.
For several weeks now, WP has been busy fixing and convincing us players to support the RO2's WOE system and yet.... First Official WOE was successful and the castle has been claimed by Aesir Guild and not even one Recognition was given by WP... I'm just curious Why?
a.) Is it because, the first Official WOE castle owner was not one of their l**d**s?
b.) They just don't care?
c.) They are just purely racist?
d.) They just don't know how to recognize Player's efforts and loyalty?
Note : These are purely hypothetical questions... no offense meant.
Because we are latins :'c, jk!
Posted 08 September 2013 - 07:15 PM
Well, no offense but this has like little merit, WoE is crap and We know it. Now a PLAYER LIMIT during WoE is like giving free WoE Victories to whoever have 2 or 3 allied guilds. Just take a look at how many "WoE" guilds are really active as of today?
Winning WoE as it is now is a joke, saldy
P.S. I don't WoE and I don't plan to WoE cause it's boring and unrewarding regardless of the NPC tax and the +1k HP cause Plumberg Title is even better than that WoE Buff reward lol. WP is doin' a great job making WoE a good addition to this game /sarcasm.
Edited by LOLOXORZ, 08 September 2013 - 07:19 PM.
Posted 08 September 2013 - 07:30 PM
Well, no offense but this has like little merit, WoE is crap and We know it. Now a PLAYER LIMIT during WoE is like giving free WoE Victories to whoever have 2 or 3 allied guilds. Just take a look at how many "WoE" guilds are really active as of today?
Winning WoE as it is now is a joke, saldy
P.S. I don't WoE and I don't plan to WoE cause it's boring and unrewarding regardless of the NPC tax and the +1k HP cause Plumberg Title is even better than that WoE Buff reward lol. WP is doin' a great job making WoE a good addition to this game /sarcasm.
I understand your point, and it is a viewpoint from a player who have not participated the event... but when it comes to the viewpoint of WP, WOE is supposedly their "Ace", card because they were the first RO2 server to release and develop the system. It is just disappointing that when players actually participated and supported their system even if it was far far from being a "Perfect" system, they just don't know how to appreciate such efforts and they expect us players to continue in supporting and spending money for their company.
One more thing.. If you happen to have joined the last WOE, you would have seen that there were more than enough players and guilds who participated, and as far as I know... Aesir guild has no ally guild that time and yet succeeded. Anyways, I respect your opinion and I hope someday you would try joining WOE, because for us, win or lose, with or without recognition, Its all about FUN and being together with your real friends who treat you as family and not as mere pawns for disposal
Edited by xGanelon, 08 September 2013 - 07:31 PM.
Posted 08 September 2013 - 08:06 PM
I understand your point, and it is a viewpoint from a player who have not participated the event... but when it comes to the viewpoint of WP, WOE is supposedly their "Ace", card because they were the first RO2 server to release and develop the system. It is just disappointing that when players actually participated and supported their system even if it was far far from being a "Perfect" system, they just don't know how to appreciate such efforts and they expect us players to continue in supporting and spending money for their company.
One more thing.. If you happen to have joined the last WOE, you would have seen that there were more than enough players and guilds who participated, and as far as I know... Aesir guild has no ally guild that time and yet succeeded. Anyways, I respect your opinion and I hope someday you would try joining WOE, because for us, win or lose, with or without recognition, Its all about FUN and being together with your real friends who treat you as family and not as mere pawns for disposal
LOLS? No allied guilds?
Collision(?) And pretty much any single Chilean guild there... But as I said, WoE is crap, it requires no real effort as long as you have 2 or 3 allies with this low population (WoE actives) it works like this
"MAIN GUILD" or guild who is going to take the castle among the alliance gets the protection of the other guilds for them to take the fortress ok? so the people that is NOT allied to any of the said guilds is going to fight pretty much against 3 or 4 ALLIED GUILDS+Randoms.
And the fact that WoE has a 400 player cap make it even worst, let's say the defending guild has up to 50-70 members on, then add another 30-50 from each allied guild that's about 200 players working as a DEFENSIVE WALL against 200 players that might NOT be allied to anyone nor organized and fighting to each other... you get my point now? about how easy to get a fortress in this WoE is?
Edited by LOLOXORZ, 08 September 2013 - 08:09 PM.
Posted 08 September 2013 - 08:25 PM
LOLS? No allied guilds?
Collision(?) And pretty much any single Chilean guild there... But as I said, WoE is crap, it requires no real effort as long as you have 2 or 3 allies with this low population (WoE actives) it works like this
"MAIN GUILD" or guild who is going to take the castle among the alliance gets the protection of the other guilds for them to take the fortress ok? so the people that is NOT allied to any of the said guilds is going to fight pretty much against 3 or 4 ALLIED GUILDS+Randoms.
And the fact that WoE has a 400 player cap make it even worst, let's say the defending guild has up to 50-70 members on, then add another 30-50 from each allied guild that's about 200 players working as a DEFENSIVE WALL against 200 players that might NOT be allied to anyone nor organized and fighting to each other... you get my point now? about how easy to get a fortress in this WoE is?
LMAO.. Regardless of having allies or not, the Castle was not occupied by any Guild, every guild was given a fair chance to take over the castle at the first place. Having a bad or good guild was not even the point, WOE is the only option in the game where you can fight with your guild mates side by side against other players and have FUN, that is the MAIN point, Simple, I never argued about WOE being good or CRAP, because as far as I am concerned, the WOE system is still on its development stages and can be rated as a "BAD" , incomplete Siege system but at least players have that option, and if you are not interested in such, it is your own decision, with your own reason but the issues between guilds and ALLIES are out of the topic. FARM FOREVER if that is what you consider FUN, but for us, twice a week of Massive PVP Guild vs GUILD, may it be "CRAPPY" or Not, we consider it FUN, rather than 24/7 killing mobs .
One more thing, Getting the Castle was not easy... and if it was really easy as you say it is, It would be better if you show us some proof instead of pure textual conspiracies. Make your guild get the castle next WOE, have a screenshot. After that, you can tell everyone that getting a fortress is easy in this game but until then... keep on farming
Edited by xGanelon, 08 September 2013 - 08:30 PM.
Posted 08 September 2013 - 08:45 PM
For several weeks now, WP has been busy fixing and convincing us players to support the RO2's WOE system and yet.... First Official WOE was successful and the castle has been claimed by Aesir Guild and not even one Recognition was given by WP... I'm just curious Why?
a.) Is it because, the first Official WOE castle owner was not one of their l**d**s?
b.) They just don't care?
c.) They are just purely racist?
d.) They just don't know how to recognize Player's efforts and loyalty?
Note : These are purely hypothetical questions... no offense meant.
a-b-c-d) Aesir isnt in the top 15 guilds who spent the most money in the game. That's why I think there is no recognition ~
Edited by 4567130503151817777, 08 September 2013 - 08:46 PM.
Posted 08 September 2013 - 08:55 PM
Ughh because the real major good guilds quit and left RO2? that's why WoE is crap now and it's really not a big deal? but that's just me.
Major good guild? What does have to do with you? And yeah its fine with you coz the gold emperium owner is milking the game 150k zeny a week. Get out of here man.
Posted 08 September 2013 - 09:18 PM
What does money have to do with skills? That's how your logic works?
Edited by 4567130503151817777, 08 September 2013 - 09:19 PM.
Posted 08 September 2013 - 09:39 PM
Major good guild? What does have to do with you? And yeah its fine with you coz the gold emperium owner is milking the game 150k zeny a week. Get out of here man.
What does have to do with me? NOTHING. did you read what i posted? "that's just me" means that's my "opinion", read first before you judge people. you read the message wrong.."man"
Edited by peterhatch, 08 September 2013 - 09:40 PM.
Posted 08 September 2013 - 10:33 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users