also ,
- For every point of the user's INT, MATK increases by 3%, which stacks additively with the Base Damage.
Posted 09 April 2014 - 09:45 AM
reading a table is hard especially if table doesn't have what you're pointing at.
I just realized that formula was shown at balancing changes
Posted 09 April 2014 - 09:45 AM
That's nice except he posted the exact same formula that's given in the table and the following lines.
well we're clearly at an impasse then, because both of us think we're right. Just hold of on attacking each other until the servers can come up and we can get to the bottom of this using proof.
Posted 09 April 2014 - 09:49 AM
well we're clearly at an impasse then, because both of us think we're right. Just hold of on attacking each other until the servers can come up and we can get to the bottom of this using proof.
I give up.You're right.Somebody should have made that a single line equation instead of a table.
Posted 09 April 2014 - 10:01 AM
Posted 09 April 2014 - 11:39 AM
Wow! You went to all that trouble and ended up using the wrong skill?
Posted 09 April 2014 - 11:43 AM
Equations are the same. If it applies to DD, it should apply to PW and EG as well.
But if you don't believe me, i'll be more than happy to prove you wrong again.
Edited by Lapphy, 09 April 2014 - 11:43 AM.
Posted 09 April 2014 - 11:46 AM
First of all the equations are different.Check irowiki.
Second we both agreed on the same formula that Toxn posted so i don't see how you'll prove me wrong.
I merely stated that your interpretation of the formula was wrong.
Would some neutral third person come here and clear it up?
Posted 09 April 2014 - 11:59 AM
Congratulations...on what again?
Damage on the first is : [3.50+129*0.03]*116/100*223 = 1906 - 2.62%mdef = 1856
Second : [3.5+129*0.03]*116/100*247 = 2111 - 2.62%mdef = 2056
Third : [3.5+143*0.03]*116/100*251 = 2268 - 2.62%mdef = 2208
Posted 09 April 2014 - 12:04 PM
lol argues with me this entire thread, doesn't know what he's arguing about. good game sir. I can't take you seriously anymore.
I feel like i just got trolled the ish out of.
Edited by Lapphy, 09 April 2014 - 12:05 PM.
Posted 09 April 2014 - 12:30 PM
rather, i think what im trying to say is, MATK stacks additively, while int is a multiplier
meaning MATK, is just a number tacked on at the end of the damage calculation
Posted 09 April 2014 - 04:09 PM
Posted 09 April 2014 - 04:45 PM
I know but i have personally tested psy wave.
Posted 09 April 2014 - 04:58 PM
Matk multiplies to the damage. You are interpreting the formula wrong. Sb is right.
On a side note, quoting irowiki in general doesn't prove your point 100%. Irowiki articles are maintained by regular players like you and me and the average joe. The balance formulas I have found to be 100% accurate though.
Posted 10 April 2014 - 12:58 PM
Jesus Christ...
Do it again with this procedure.
Posted 17 April 2014 - 05:38 PM
Posted 17 April 2014 - 05:45 PM
Having 1 agi on a sorc would be so detrimental...
Posted 21 April 2014 - 12:34 AM
You forgot Matk+1% from both items and Orc warriors have 14 SoftMdef.Congratulations...on what again?
Damage on the first is : [3.50+129*0.03]*116/100*223 = 1906 - 2.62%mdef = 1856
Second : [3.5+129*0.03]*116/100*247 = 2111 - 2.62%mdef = 2056
Third : [3.5+143*0.03]*116/100*251 = 2268 - 2.62%mdef = 2208
Edited by Sigma1, 21 April 2014 - 12:36 AM.
Posted 23 April 2014 - 05:53 PM
Having 1 agi on a sorc would be so detrimental...
I am debating on this myself.
How should I allocate agi, dex and luk? I know dex and luk both help matk a little bit.
For vit, I know as long as I get 100 (job 50 bonus included) I will be fine with stun immunity.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users