6 replies to this topic

[firecheese]

I am curious whether it would be better to get a lavalon weapon, skip aram and get a bone weapon or get an aram weapon instead and skip bone. I have heard that bone weapons have been nerfed so I am wondering if it would be more money efficient to only make an aram weapon instead of making a lavalon weapon and bone weapon.

[StormHaven]

BD weps for wars got buffed

[firecheese]

BD weps for wars got buffed

Yes I understand that, but Don't they still possess more power than Aram weapons?

[CHiSEEN]

Yes I understand that, but Don't they still possess more power than Aram weapons?

he said they got BUFFED not nerfed. ALL new warrior weapons have way more attack than their heirloom versions... A normal Lv 51 sword is better than my Hierloom Magma Sword.

In terms of attack power:
Lavalon < Aram < Bone Dragon

In terms of difficulty to obtain:
Bone Dragon < Aram < Lavalon

Edited by CHiSEEN, 18 November 2010 - 05:26 PM.

[StormHaven]

yes they do. i'd skip Magma and go for Aram until BD

[firecheese]

he said they got BUFFED not nerfed. ALL new warrior weapons have way more attack than their heirloom versions... A normal Lv 51 sword is better than my Hierloom Magma Sword.

In terms of attack power:
Lavalon < Aram < Bone Dragon

In terms of difficulty to obtain:
Bone Dragon < Aram < Lavalon

yes they do. i'd skip Magma and go for Aram until BD

Thanks for the clarification.

[PieIsGood]

aram wep= lvl 55
bd= lvl 60... hmmm 5 lvls? waste of money moar? lol imo at least its easy to lvl, i got from 53-58 in a day on an exp day