Hey all , I wanted to know what are the main differences between these 2?
As I can see is that Zerk is meant to be all in dmg with decent hp but most of their skills hardly go over +500 additional dmg...They use hp consumption fair enough but i dont see why be a zerk when wl is better.
As WL u get same sort of stuff , if not better.The big difference may be zerk can dual wield(People saying this may be gone too..) but other than that i dont know.Also the percentage around 29% hp inc buff is good when geared.
Zerk has 2 skills to reduce opponent def,however WL has 1 skills which reduce opponent def and literally a low cd+more def reduction.
WL seems to have more control too with another terror skill+alot of hp/def buffs with no negative debuffs on it where as zerk u have to always loose something to gain something.
WL=Support
Zerk=Rage and killer
But it seems the opposite,their arnt even any good zerk skills which deal good dmg like many others have said.Even if they do remove dual wield from zerk, this class will really go dead.Their is just nothing their.
To sum it up , Zerk is a copy of WL but nerfed.
Feel free to comment.