Lets put it in a different perspective,
Say you run a business that generates material 'XXX' and it wasnt selling very well. You then start selling shares to your company and particular entrepreneurs buy into your company, at a point that 70% shares are owned by these entrepreneurs. These entrepreneurs are also interested in material 'XXX' and invest heavily into it.
one particular consumer of material 'XXX' requests more of this product, but your company notices that figures for this particular consumer of material 'XXX' does not ever seem to meet the quota of sales. Meanwhile all entrepreneurs want more material 'XXX' and are willing to pay more for it.
In this case scenario who would you be pandering more to? The entrepreneur's who hold major shares in your company and are willinv to pay more or the consumer that markets your material 'XXX' but never can seem to meet the expected target quota you need?
This in no way is whats happening between kRO and iRO:jRO nor am i implying it. I just simply put out an ethical dilemma of the capitalist variety.
I know what you mean but 2 ~ 4 years to delivery a bug fix is stupid,even if iRO revenue is low (and as far as i know is not).
Not allowing Camp or another GM to fix this bug is even more stupid.