@AAEM: It's only fair to say that some instances are catered to specific classes, and thus other "weak" classes like performers shouldn't QQ if they can't finish, if you can name a certain instance in which these weak classes gain an upper hand over other classes. WL (a relatively "weak" class) is convenient for GMT. RKs, Rangers, GXs, are convenient for almost everything. Genes come next. Archbishops are convenient for instances filled with Demons and Undeads. What about Performers, Shadow Chasers, etc.? What instances can be claimed to be "specially made for them"? You know it's not fair for players to be forced to create certain "OP" classes that don't really appeal to their taste just to be able to finish instances.
Totally agree with this, and that's why I've been ranting about how classes are unbalanced, and why this is way worse than many veterans think for a long time. However, being balanced also means that classes should have weaknesses, and I've never ranted about my warlock having a hellish time trying to finish OGH. or being complete trash against Shadow/Holy MVPs. Warlocks are supposed to have this weakness, the problem with this class is elsewhere. But, they REALLY should either make more instances which require a party to be completed (like ToDG), or give support classes better damage capabilities, so they can solo some (not neccessarily all) instances. Or design some instances specifically for AB (with all monsters being undead/demon race and undead/shadow property, and low MDEF/High Damage, whatever...) and Performers (don't ask me how to do this one).
guess there should be nightmare GMT for people who thinks current GMT is too easy.
I'd love it, if Fenrir got a higher drop rate for her card, OR an improved card (Realised Fenrir Card, lol), and the coins in this NGMT could be used to buy better gears, or to OP Enchant the regular GMT gears.