RC gx and the new itens - Thief Class - WarpPortal Community Forums

Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

RC gx and the new itens


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 RomeroMelo

RomeroMelo

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 654 posts
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 16 July 2017 - 08:51 PM

Hey guys, i've been away for a few months and was wondering... Is this mob scarf any better than a Tengu Set? It triggers me the part of only been able to use glasses, and losing the leech, but besides it, is there some dmg impovement?

 

Other thing is... these abusive robes combo are better then perfect nab + Faw fs16? Or should i use it with the faw?


  • 0

#2 mikkotinamide

mikkotinamide

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1391 posts

Posted 16 July 2017 - 09:27 PM

IMO, for the most part, mob scarf vs. tengu depends on which other class you plan to share it with.


  • 0

#3 ChaoticRK

ChaoticRK

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 3228 posts
  • Locationprt_fild08
  • Playing:Nothing

Posted 17 July 2017 - 01:27 AM

Faw, unless it's over over over upgraded then the valk will be a good atk boost but it still depends on what is your setup.
  • 0

#4 Ashuckel

Ashuckel

    '-' intensifies

  • Members
  • 18996 posts
  • LocationJohto, Hoenn, Unova, Kalos, Alola
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 17 July 2017 - 03:14 AM

only for crit. For skills/dd da, the 10% size modifier from tengu is still better
(and this is comparing the full 120str/luk effect of mob scarf, 18% atk)

the robes are easily superior to any other armor in the game when enchanted properly.

faw vs valk depends solely on how much raw atk you already have vs %. As well as crit vs skills (for crit always pick faw, at least util more crit dmg is added to the game)

Edited by Ashuckel, 17 July 2017 - 03:17 AM.

  • 1

#5 RomeroMelo

RomeroMelo

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 654 posts
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 17 July 2017 - 06:24 AM

well, always Ashuckel.... Thanks guys, i bought an +7 Abusive and that Scarf as i seems to be good in other classes, gonna test the abusive + valk if i get a good enchant... Although i need to upgrade it further :/

 

Thanks again


  • 0

#6 turuco15

turuco15

    I made it Off Topic

  • Members
  • 37 posts

Posted 18 July 2017 - 07:38 AM

what is this "valk" you guys are talking about? valk manteau? And what are the possible enchants on abusive?


  • 0

#7 ChaoticRK

ChaoticRK

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 3228 posts
  • Locationprt_fild08
  • Playing:Nothing

Posted 18 July 2017 - 10:05 AM



what is this "valk" you guys are talking about? valk manteau? And what are the possible enchants on abusive?

 

See it here. The end part showing runes. I think it's on this forum as well but I forget where.


Edited by ChaoticRK, 18 July 2017 - 10:07 AM.

  • 0

#8 yamasakai90

yamasakai90

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 3029 posts
  • LocationUnder the Ground
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 23 July 2017 - 08:01 PM

I main my +13 abusive robe and +0 wakwak valk manteau on my RC GX these days. 

 

FAW FS 16 is 57 attack, so 15% of 400 attack is already 60. If you have more than 400 attack, it should normally do well. (ignoring the order of eATK and % ATK in dmg calculation).

 

Don't forget for str/luk its 6% ATK , 5 crit and 10% crit dmg! 


  • 0

#9 RomeroMelo

RomeroMelo

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 654 posts
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 24 July 2017 - 08:18 AM

Doing some test i found out that wakwak valk is better than FAW (fs16 and wakwak), I'm using +12 Abusive Str2/str2, and testing in the egg my dmg with the faw is around 137k per spin, while i hit around 150k with valk. Although i still main faw as the dmg and hp isnt Worth the hit loss those FS gives. Even though the Robe isnt perfect as i not stupid and rich enough to try to +13 it with out event and am still getting my funds back lol


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users