Yo any other guilds wanna join that Insurection Alliance?
#51
Posted 08 August 2010 - 05:28 PM
The biased modding has already begun imo. Can't even speak out against blatantly wrong and biased BS. But all the Valk members and allies get to come here and bash away. Feels like iro Wiki forums all over again.
#52
Posted 08 August 2010 - 05:34 PM
No one forces you to use this forum or wiki or any forum at all. Just leave and it's all good for you? Sounds like an easy solution to a few of your problems.evil forum
#53
Posted 08 August 2010 - 05:35 PM
Lol remember the you pulled on Iris(8 guilds merged into 4) and got wiped over and over by 3(1/2 sized) guilds for 6months? Yeah........I doCause I dont think 7 guilds is enough guys. Just saying you should go for more.
Dont worry, all the good people are moving on soon enough and NO *might* be able to "dominate" the woe scene again.
#54
Posted 08 August 2010 - 05:43 PM
My god what is happening to this server.
Edited by Sera, 08 August 2010 - 05:43 PM.
#55
Posted 08 August 2010 - 06:15 PM
He literally just said NO is bad, so I don't know if he's trolling or being serious and messed up his words. Because all the "GOOD" people are moving soon eough.
#56
Posted 08 August 2010 - 06:35 PM
When NO is the last guild remaining is what he meant.
He literally just said NO is bad, so I don't know if he's trolling or being serious and messed up his words. Because all the "GOOD" people are moving soon eough.
He just thinks all of the good people are in Windfall, and everyone else is rubbish. But I know a few people in Windfall who are.. Lol..
HOWEVER. I will agree, NO has fallen apart so badly that not even the very core members WoE with them. Sorry, Vu, your baby has died; and you can't even keep my soul linker in guild for a day. ]:
#57
Posted 08 August 2010 - 06:55 PM
#58
Posted 08 August 2010 - 06:56 PM
Edit: I don't know who is any good these days. I haven't participated in WoE since server merge.
I'm good, though. WAY good.
fareal.
Edited by Kimmy, 08 August 2010 - 06:58 PM.
#59
Posted 08 August 2010 - 07:01 PM
He's in EA though (for now).Cola is in Windfall... So, he automatically thinks they're good. And I'm sure Jayed thinks the same. ]:
#60
Posted 08 August 2010 - 07:01 PM
#61
Posted 08 August 2010 - 07:02 PM
windfall died, don't speak ill of the dead
SEE! Shows you how much I know about WoE.
My point still stands.
#62
Posted 08 August 2010 - 07:03 PM
Just saying I remember defending 5 Eco castles with 4 guilds on iris. So unless they can at least match that id say they are a failure.
Key word in that Statement Iris... Not = to Ymir...
No hard feelings there, Iris people are good, I have a few in my guild and In my Alliance, but the Comparison can not be Iris to Ymir, Chaos to Ymir or Loki to Ymir... The new server has all population and is a whole new and different beast. The comparison just can not be made...
#63
Posted 08 August 2010 - 07:07 PM
If anything, kudos to Insurrection/EA for being in the top 5 guilds on iRO longer than most guilds have been in existence.
#64
Posted 08 August 2010 - 07:09 PM
#65
Posted 08 August 2010 - 07:32 PM
Eternal | AsuraEA? Spell for me, people. I'm no good with abbreviations.
Anyways, guilds rise and guilds fall. It's just nice that some guilds have managed to stay alive (semi-alive) for this long. Being in NO was fun while it lasted. . . then they cleaned up their forums and deleted my account . As for the current Insur, too bad very few of their members remember me being in that guild 2.75 years ago, but oh well, WoE is still fun.
#66
Posted 08 August 2010 - 07:54 PM
Bad Kimmy! Way to fail =(No one really said NO was good. However, Cola is in Windfall... So, he automatically thinks they're good. And I'm sure Jayed thinks the same. ]:
Edit: I don't know who is any good these days. I haven't participated in WoE since server merge.
I'm good, though. WAY good.
fareal.
Windfall wasnt "bad" back bone of the dominating alliance then leader took a break and now im in E|A who I was gonna join pre merge anyway. E|A has its kinks and things to work out, but the people are fun and we drop everyone but SGN in woe so far so its all gravy.
#67
Posted 08 August 2010 - 07:55 PM
#68
Posted 08 August 2010 - 08:00 PM
#69
Posted 08 August 2010 - 08:02 PM
Iris Logic.
Lack of logic.
^ This guy know's what he's talking about.I'm pretty sure his reply is related to the initial topic of this thread. You know, this topic about WoE and stuff, stuff that happens ingame, outside of this forum.
Seriously.
Edited by ichigank, 08 August 2010 - 08:04 PM.
#70
Posted 08 August 2010 - 08:21 PM
#71
Posted 08 August 2010 - 09:38 PM
^ This guy know's what he's talking about.
Seriously.
And my point still stands. [:
#72
Posted 09 August 2010 - 06:51 AM
I'll add to the drama a little by saying that anyone who comes against my alliance will meet this situation.
Edited by Ramen, 09 August 2010 - 06:54 AM.
#73
Posted 09 August 2010 - 08:08 AM
I asked both Resplendent and Doddler to be moderators, not the other way around. They both have agreed long ago to work with me when it came to website stuff for their respective sites, so I have had ample time to build up that trust relationship. And yes sometimes I disagree with stuff they post or did, but it is something that we deal with as we go.
If you feel any moderator is being abusive of their position, whether they be volunteer or staff, they can be reported, we want the forums to be a place people can speak freely and get their point across (as long as that speech isn't filled with abuse).
#74
Posted 09 August 2010 - 08:21 AM
#75
Posted 09 August 2010 - 08:45 AM
It may not be a popularity contest, you need to actually have a contest to have the popularity to be a deciding factor, but it does show there is preference to certain players on this game.You do realize that forum moderation is not a popularity contest. The 2 chosen by now for Ragnarok are people that have forum admining experience and are people that I have worked with many times in the past. I didn't make an open call for Volunteers because I don't have the capacity to hold tryouts, test and monitor a ton of people (of which many could be excellent candidates.)
I asked both Resplendent and Doddler to be moderators, not the other way around. They both have agreed long ago to work with me when it came to website stuff for their respective sites, so I have had ample time to build up that trust relationship. And yes sometimes I disagree with stuff they post or did, but it is something that we deal with as we go.
If you feel any moderator is being abusive of their position, whether they be volunteer or staff, they can be reported, we want the forums to be a place people can speak freely and get their point across (as long as that speech isn't filled with abuse).
Edited by GhostShadow, 09 August 2010 - 09:01 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users