That's all I really said, and to be honest, the response to this thread actually annoys me a little bit, because I don't see it being reflected in the responses to the Seal Quest Update Proposals.
People aren't fully considering all of the things they're proposing (Asking for level 3 weapons from a quest that is specifically supposed to give level 4 weapons)
I think you are referring to me for bringing up the weapon for sages and my proposed solution was the level 3 principles of magic instead of the book of apocalypse.
Seal 4 was specifically supposed be many things but right now many of things are being debated. Seal 4 was supposed to give some crappy weapons but no one seems to have a problem with getting rid of them. Seal 4 was supposed to offer a choice between random and set weapons but that is being rehauled without much regard for some weapons which will no longer be obtainable. Seal quests were not specifically supposed to give kvm badges but do you see many ppl screaming NO to that?
I do realise seal quest 4 is for level 4 weapon but would iRO really be torn asunder if a significantly worse weapon than the more popular kronos was included simply because it was level 3?
In any case, Heim said to post it elsewhere for them to look into, so at least they noted my point had merit and i am perfectly happy with that.
or are proposing things for personal gain (Item X should/should not be implemented because of it's relation to people who farm MVPs).
A point that has been repeatedly brought up in that thread is the fact that some weapon classes are REALLY BAD in relation to others, but there's nothing that can be done about that without a game-system overhaul, which is not the point of the thread. Yes, the system does need to be overhauled imo, but we have to work with what we currently have, and what we currently have is a quest which gives badly outdated weapons and is not worth doing anymore.
To the people who are deriding me for being harsh on people who just have 'fun ideas':
Is it wrong of me to ask that the proposals that people submit for things which may actually be implemented into the game be rational and well-thought-out?
Is it wrong of me to ask that anything being considered for implementation benefit the majority of players, be within the competence of iRO to implement, and not just try to band-aid something up until it breaks again next week?
Ideally i do agree with some of the things you said and it would be great if everyone was super objective but we don't live in a perfect world. Everyone is allowed to express their opinions on the forums within limits and their ideas will be judged on their merits.
Did you take a minute out to review some of your own posts which are upwards of 3000? You can post as much as you want while others should be restricted? With just a quick look at some of your posts and threads can one honestly say all of them are well though out?
Examples of your posts:
I just bought a staff for my warlock that she cannot wear and i felt i had to immediately tweet on the forums:
http://forums.warppo...__1#entry399147Lets make an ancient willow mvp just because a map is willow shaped despite there being no pressing reason for this when there are plenty more important things that could be worked on instead:
http://forums.warppo...__1#entry396949GMs weekly second chance vends of valuable items that you missed the chance to buy but the gms have magically duplicated for your convenience:
http://forums.warppo...__1#entry140555Talking to yourself:
http://forums.warppo...__1#entry348782