I edited it into my last post but I'll add some simple points to help you "c."
-The set was designed with Naruto characters in mind
-The set was never designed with Naruto logos and slight differences for legal purposes
-To claim they are separate designs is false
-It is indeed a Naruto set, but it is legally not Naruto
Is it hard to understand that?
now i understand ur point of view. it makes sense.
yah naruto does suck 200% agree on that. makes me remember the news some kid burried his friend alive in sandbox after watching naruto
Well, first of all, you just seem stupid because of how you type. It's like one of those Facebook status games where you try to type things with your nose or elbow, except you're abnormally adept at it. I've found a diagram detailing how I think you type out your messages here:
Further more, you just keep posting like a child stamping his foot and saying "NO, THAT'S NOT WHAT IT'S CALLED, STOP DOING SOMETHING I DON'T LIKE".
Just because it's not specifically called the Naruto set doesn't mean people can't call it the "Naruto" set, especially since it's made to look just like it while changing just enough to make sure they didn't get sued.
It's like people are calling soda "pop" and you're throwing yourself to the floor and whining about it saying "WELL GUISE, THE MAKERS OF THIS SODA HAD TO CHANGE THEIR NAME BECAUSE OF A BAND IN CALIFORNIA, SO I'M JUST GOING TO USE THIS AS A NON-SEQUITIR ARGUMENT AGAINST IT QQQQQQ".
posting like a kid? qq'in?
idk how u r looking at it but this is not the right thing u would say in an arguement. seems to me u r the kid here. idk how u've been looking at my post with ur 2 eyes, u just simply jump into conclusion, refuse to stand in my shoes, n fire away.
Kazu seems to understand this better and willing to settle with proper manner.
also soda exsit before w/e band was formed, so i wouldnt make the soda pop change name in that case. ty for sharing
Edited by bwsnoopy, 03 August 2011 - 07:36 AM.