Fire Guardian/Water Guardian Change Discussion
#76
Posted 25 August 2011 - 08:55 AM
#77
Posted 25 August 2011 - 09:03 AM
#78
Posted 25 August 2011 - 09:08 AM
In my opinion, the best way to fix this is to have an event on the fourth week of customer appreciation month, in which players can exchange their guardian sets, that have options on them for a new IM set of their choice with at least the same soulcraft grade.
I'd +1 you but you'll have to wait till I get home.
#79
Posted 25 August 2011 - 09:09 AM
Edited by SpringSky, 25 August 2011 - 10:05 AM.
#80
Posted 25 August 2011 - 09:15 AM
Your tune sure changed once what you wanted went into effect.The main thing I spent all my gold on in this game was guardian pieces. +15 and artifact or legendary of each piece plus expanded. I've spent well over 100k gold on guardian equips, and Gravity doesn't even decide to mention that there is a probability that they may nerf the equips back to original status? I bought a water guardian weapon and trip balloon for 60k gold too. Yay! I guess those will probably get nerfed next. What a rip off and time waste! All of a sudden, it's "a bug" when the equips have been altered since the server started and this is the first we hear of this. Bull . I haven't seen any staff reply warning that something like this may happen. I don't want a couple w coins and a soul stack for my equips. That's like a slap in the face. It's been fun, but I don't like how things are handled here. We don't get any warning and things are changed all the time that-_- players over. Time to quit I guess....
#81
Posted 25 August 2011 - 10:11 AM
Your tune sure changed once what you wanted went into effect.
I'm sorry, Prince.
It's just that time of the month. >_<
#82
Posted 25 August 2011 - 10:14 AM
#83
Posted 25 August 2011 - 10:34 AM
#84
Posted 25 August 2011 - 11:16 AM
I've already lost 90% of my old DS friends in the last couple of weeks to other games. Wonder how many will be left after this week is out?
maybe 99 % this game is going down....
#85
Posted 25 August 2011 - 11:20 AM
You wanted a fix and got a fix. On the winning side, I'd be pretty grateful to have had my voice heard in the first place.I'm sorry, Prince.
If I had realized that I wanted the equips completely reverted to their original state after all this time, instead of having them at least put on par with the other best equips for balancing reasons, I probably wouldn't have been so forceful or adamant about voicing my contradictory, stupid, and unreasonable opinions...
It's just that time of the month. >_<
#86
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:06 PM
It's no solution to soul-bind Guardian sets unless they are also made have the same stats as Special IM sets, which is something I don't think people want anyway. Soul-binding Guardian sets as they are will simply create players who are permanently advantageous to others simply because they had a Guardian Set on the night of September 1st.
I agree there are other major issues to be worried about than Guardian Sets. People have cried about them for ages, there's even a thread about them in the Game Balances section, and something was finally done. I think anyone who believes the GMs weren't concerned about them are fooling themselves.
#87
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:08 PM
Today was to be a happy day for me because today and the day of my birthday.
But this news from the Guardian Exchange by simple W-coin and soul.
Leave me very sad that day that was to be happy.
I was born on 25/08/1987
Happy Birthday suporte64!
#88
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:14 PM
#89
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:18 PM
You wanted a fix and got a fix. On the winning side, I'd be pretty grateful to have had my voice heard in the first place.
Solution1 does not equal solution2, prince... Psuedo intelectual cynicism and sarcasm aside, I'm not really in the mood for being needlessly corrected or baited into lecturing a troll about the folly of power tripping, passiveness, hypocrisy and egotism. Jum's solution is awesome. Kids are upset. I doubt you want to start this. Let's try not to derail the thread.
#90
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:23 PM
I think most of people wont be this rage if they are given the what so called COMPENSATION. But seriously, 1 W-coin and 1 soul stack cant even be called a compensation for a Guardian Set. No words can describe how stupid this compensation are.
I think WP should reconsider the compensation for Guardian Set.
BTW, could someone tell me the details of the guardian sets stat at THQ? Really curious about this but couldnt find it.
#91
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:23 PM
Part of the reason for the reverting of the Fire/Water Guardian sets came after over a month of discussions, observations, and testing with the sets. I had gone over this with some of the users last night.
Once we had heard that the stats were not as they were supposed to be, which was much later then when it had occurred. Prices were indeed set and limitations were made. We had spoken with the developer and they asked that the bonuses be removed. We took the time to determine the effect of the sets in-game.
First, we had spoken to many of the more prominent, older users in the game, about the set. They said that the set mainly affected the balance in the, below 60 range. They (names that I will not mention, unless they choose to decide to make themselves known), also mentioned that the Physical Damage Drop can also be obtained from the items as well as the item providing the best stat boost compared to other Item Mall sets in-game. The Physical Damage Drop is also another imbalance concern in the Game Balance thread.
Along with this concern was the use of the Guardian Sets by users in the lower level Battlesquare providing an unfair advantage for the newer users to compete. Users that are older and had the sets were "farming" those in the Battlesquare for gold and experience potions and not providing an entry point for newer users to experience what Battlesquare is supposed to be.
So again, let's use this thread to discuss the concerns of the server in the Game Balance thread as the developers are highly interested in them. The Aim/Evade(we'll keep it in the other thread for discussion) was a temporary change, but there will be other things that will take much more time that they would like to balance. From the WarpPortal standpoint, please feel free to discuss and bring up your concerns and we'll try to address them. We do like to hear from our users and are open to review some your thoughts.
#92
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:35 PM
Didn't speak to me and I have been on the server since day 1 of THQ's release.
RE: Physical Damage Drop
now mages with old sets are pretty much the only ones with a good amount of it are you going to remove their sets? because guardian doesn't actually give much
^ correction the devil set gives the PDD angel gives magic drop.
Edited by EnderW, 25 August 2011 - 01:43 PM.
#93
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:38 PM
First, we had spoken to many of the more prominent, older users in the game
Didn't speak to me and I have been on the server since day 1 of THQ's release.
Last i checked many is not all.
He spoke to me about it briefly one night in casual conversation. Been here just as long as you. I don't get the point you are trying to prove here.
#94
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:40 PM
I think maybe he just mostly spoke to people that didn't want others using guardian.
how about you I see you're a warmage whats your PDD like?
#95
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:43 PM
First, we had spoken to many of the more prominent, older users in the game
Didn't speak to me and I have been on the server since day 1 of THQ's release.
RE: Physical Damage Drop
now mages with old sets are pretty much the only ones with a good amount of it are you going to remove their sets? because guardian doesn't actually give much
heck the angel set on the mixboard right now gives 6% PPD sure it's not quite as much as the guardian but it's only 3% less PDD than the guardian set up i use
I would be perfectly fine with nerfing old mage sets, personally. But that's just me.
Also, the angel set only gives 5% PDD, I believe, from the wings (a possible 10% MDD with the set, as well). But that's less than half the 12% PDD possible using a mixture of Guardian pieces.
I am questioning his sample size for his questioning.
I think maybe he just mostly spoke to people that didn't want others using guardian.
how about you I see you're a warmage whats your PDD like?
All players who could get their hands on them wanted them, regardless of class, and why would they not want others using Guardian when it would mean they couldn't use it themselves?
Also, for the record, I was there for one of these discussions as well and there were players whose mains were archers, thieves and warriors who also said PDD needed to be nerfed.
"PDD needed to be nerfed." Not Guardian sets, specifically, but PDD, the stat itself -- that's what the discussion I attended talked about. Yes, of course, Guardian sets came up in that discussion, b/c they are one of the main sources of PDD/MDD and they are available to all classes.
I already noted in the Game Balances section that I felt nerfing the sets would force an unfair loss of investment on players. And I also made a suggestion that didn't concern nerfing the sets:
First off, what Maronu said is completely true. And if WP had nerfed the Guardian sets right from the get-go, that would have been perfectly fine. The problem stems from the fact that, because the Guardian sets' bonuses were allowed to remain in game for this long, there are many players who have poured thousands and thousands of gold into purchasing and/or upgrading these items. Nerfing them now would mean a significant loss on those investments.
Having said that -- I, personally, see nothing wrong with nerfing all IM items to level 1 items, as Endbringer and Yurai suggested, so long as the stats default to maximum to at least somewhat preserve players' investments in these sets.
But like Storm said, the real problem isn't the soulcrafted options, it's the bonus stats (the PDD/MDD and the extra health/agility, in particular). I'm not sure how you can nerf or remove those stats without it being unfair (considering the investments mentioned above), but I do believe that releasing a new, comparable set (or multiple sets) would be fair and help address the issue.
And yes, I noted that I was okay with nerfing them, myself, but made it very clear that was only my own personal opinion.
Edited by Rimmy, 25 August 2011 - 01:55 PM.
#96
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:46 PM
I would be perfectly fine with nerfing old mage sets, personally. But that's just me.
Also, the angel set only gives 5% PDD, I believe, from the wings (a possible 10% MDD with the set, as well). But that's less than half the 12% PDD possible using a mixture of Guardian pieces.
Doesn't devil set give 10% PDD instead?
#97
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:47 PM
I am questioning his sample size for his questioning.
I think maybe he just mostly spoke to people that didn't want others using guardian.
how about you I see you're a warmage whats your PDD like?
Not counting my current guardian set, 0% PDD from gear. and level 8 mana shield.
#98
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:47 PM
Edited by EnderW, 25 August 2011 - 01:48 PM.
#99
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:49 PM
#100
Posted 25 August 2011 - 01:53 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users