Lucky Spin Update (patch v.393) - Page 3 - Patch Notes Archive - WarpPortal Community Forums

Jump to content


Photo

Lucky Spin Update (patch v.393)


  • Please log in to reply
86 replies to this topic

#51 SirSlayer

SirSlayer

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1638 posts
  • LocationUSA
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Leonis

Posted 19 March 2012 - 06:03 AM

Yeah and I'm sure most people wouldn't mind having 1 lamborghini. 1 ferrari. 1 porsche. 1 bently. But guess what G. Sometimes you don't get everything you want. soz hope it doesn't make anyone cry but that's life. Also. Why are people fighting/debating the king set it the lucky spin post. Submit a ticket or post in the suggestion thread and maybe there will be some progress made on it. ... dayum


As I have said before when someone made this irrelevant comparison. You are comparing a company(cars) who don't even need to advertise to make their sales, and direct their sales to people who can afford it. Then you have a company like Gravity, who is making games like ROSE still in development and NEEDS this money for the development of the games. If you are gonna compare those types of cars to games, compare them to games like WOW, who are also completely established and obviously know what they are doing. Sorry to say but the way this company works, is more like your local dealership who is just trying to make a quick buck by selling you whatever they can push through the lot "lucky spin", not caring about the customer.

High range car companies never have to worry about their customer because of the following. 1. Already established company in which once you say the cars name, everyone knows what you are talking about. 2. They have an entire rich customer base, to the point they don't have to cater to every person in the worlds want/sneeds.

Answer me this, is Gravity established to the point where they don't need to care about their customer? Don't think so. Get rid of IM and ROSE would either shut down, go back to p2p. Does Gravity have an entire customer base to the point where they don't need to cater to every person? Seems like they are trying to head that direction, but I guarantee the more they keep this up, the more they will be in the hole of making money.

You also don't factor in the point that they have like 4 others games they get profits from, so who cares about what just ROSE players think right? If they don't like it, we'll just get money from our other games.....suckers.

This game advertises itself to cater to kids and up, so why wouldn't you cater to those kids and make things that these kids want available in a pure form?

When you buy a toy at toys r' us, they don't have the kid GAMBLE for its accessories or the toy itself, they give a price and if the kid can afford it/want it, they buy it. When someone can afford a Lamborghini they don't gamble for it, they buy it or they don't. It is not about having and not having, it is about the crappy way people have to try and obtain these things. If I could afford a lambo I wouldn't gamble for it, I'd straight out buy it.
  • 0

#52 Feuer

Feuer

    They pay me to post

  • Members
  • 10958 posts
  • Twitter:@LovatianOwl
  • LocationCaves of Owlverick
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Le' Forumz

Posted 19 March 2012 - 09:58 AM

You're over analysing a metaphorical statement for 1. It wasn't a fact per fact comparison it was a statement saying eveyone wants somethbing in their lives and sometimes you just don't get it. Sure idd love to hit the lotto. But I still have to buy a ticket to win. Same thing with raffle found raising for charities. But you're only thinking of the negative. I think that when I purchase lucky spins its to support a game I've player for years. If I wanted to buy something directly obviously I wouldn't go to a raffle.

Also the entirety of what I was stating has nothing to do with gravity's ethics. You might want to try an tactically suexd them by "exposing" their unethical practices to get what you want. But that doesn't work in the big peoples world. So what they have a chance system in game. The refine system is a chance game. The monster drop system is a chance game. The players damage system is up to chance. You living is up to chance. Random chance occurances are a part of life. And before you state that bliving is completely uncomarable to a game systems chance game don't bother it was another metaphor.

Like I said. Its all digital junk and your gonna have to leave it up to chance. Sure you're gonna pay oney to get chances. But you could also be working instead of playing game. So you're paying in life for everything you do that isn't lucrative. Just cause one random chance system isn't to you're liking doesn't mean the world [or gravity] just gets rid of it. Be a proper human being and evolve/adapt to the way things are.
  • 0

#53 SirSlayer

SirSlayer

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1638 posts
  • LocationUSA
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Leonis

Posted 19 March 2012 - 10:37 AM

You're over analysing a metaphorical statement for 1. It wasn't a fact per fact comparison it was a statement saying eveyone wants somethbing in their lives and sometimes you just don't get it. Sure idd love to hit the lotto. But I still have to buy a ticket to win. Same thing with raffle found raising for charities. But you're only thinking of the negative. I think that when I purchase lucky spins its to support a game I've player for years. If I wanted to buy something directly obviously I wouldn't go to a raffle.

Also the entirety of what I was stating has nothing to do with gravity's ethics. You might want to try an tactically suexd them by "exposing" their unethical practices to get what you want. But that doesn't work in the big peoples world. So what they have a chance system in game. The refine system is a chance game. The monster drop system is a chance game. The players damage system is up to chance. You living is up to chance. Random chance occurances are a part of life. And before you state that bliving is completely uncomarable to a game systems chance game don't bother it was another metaphor.

Like I said. Its all digital junk and your gonna have to leave it up to chance. Sure you're gonna pay oney to get chances. But you could also be working instead of playing game. So you're paying in life for everything you do that isn't lucrative. Just cause one random chance system isn't to you're liking doesn't mean the world [or gravity] just gets rid of it. Be a proper human being and evolve/adapt to the way things are.


Why use the comparison if you are now negating the purpose of why you used it in the first place? Why not just say from the beginning you don't always get what you want? Difference here is, this isn't the lottery. You have children playing this game, more than like if you did a ratio of kids to adults who play this game, I'd put my money that over 50% of the players are under 18. Meaning over half of your "potential customers" in wait what did you say "the big boy world" lol smh, are minors. So within those minors you are subjecting them to a form of gambling, no not poker or roulette, but gambling none the less.

I'm all for supporting this game, I love this game overall. That is why I encourage ridding of the lucky spin and having flat rates for these costumes. The people that don't support lucky spin will start buying these costumes if given the chance, and for the people that already do buy lucky spin, will obviously then buy the costume as well, so how is this not a win win scenario? Well, I'll tell you. They like the fact that a kid spends $20.00 and doesn't get the costume they wanted, so now they must gamble more if they want to finish the costume pieces, even if they do with another $20.00. << How is this care for your customers,....the ones you base this game on, the age ratio this game is advertised to be around. If this game was available on a online gambling gaming site only, advertising the gamble features that would be one thing, but this game is structured for everyone.

I'm not trying to expose anyone, or sue anyone. The Lucky Spin and random chance boxes expose themselves on how dumb they are from the beginning. I certainly wouldn't try to "sue" anyone, as while this truly does bug me and a lot of others, it does not affect my daily life, so why sue? It just in the end makes a lower rating for their game. Think about it, a newcomer comes into this game and forums or someone comes back from when they played before and asks how the game is, and people reply with nothing but bashing... I don't see this with any other game. Other games in other forums, people actually encourage others to start playing the game.

You are right, everything in life is a "chance" or a "gamble". But that doesn't mean it needs to be encouraged for the worse, and to take a persons money. Another aspect, when you walk into a casino... you know your chances are very low. Do these new kids that play and desperately want this "digital junk", know there chances of getting nothing but gloves and boots constantly and maybe get their costume after however much they need to spend to get it? Or do they just end up feeling in a failed state as most do in every gambling situation. Isn't the purpose of this game to make people feel happy? I certainly know if my goal was to make money and keep my customers from coming back, I wouldn't have ANY system that gives the chance of leaving the customer feeling upset.

Be a proper human being and evolve/adapt to the way things are? lol I can't believe people think like this. smh. So no matter how a person feels, they should just shut up and deal with it right? No need to stand up for your feelings/opinions, and try for true change right? Just let people do whatever they want right? So if someone just keeps doing something someone or people don't like, they should just ALL deal with it and evolve/adapt because that is just... the way... things.... are.

You'd make a good politician, just tell people to deal with it and move along basically lol. smh.
  • 0

#54 Feuer

Feuer

    They pay me to post

  • Members
  • 10958 posts
  • Twitter:@LovatianOwl
  • LocationCaves of Owlverick
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Le' Forumz

Posted 19 March 2012 - 11:48 AM

I'm talking about dealing with the fact that are things in this world that 1. You don't always get but you want and 2. Some things in life are up to chance. If someones stabbing you no. Don't just sit there. But if you play a game of chance. It was your decision in the first place to do it. So you can't blame the system for your bad/uneducated decision.

Also on the under 18 fact. If you're under 18 then you need you're parents concent to purchase things online via a credit/dxebt card. If you're 16-18 and you have you're own credit/debt card then you probly also earn the money that's charged through it for you're purchases, thus making you competant enough to know games of chance aren't a guarentee.

Anyway I've clearly stated my opinion that in your next quote you will argue that I'm wrong. But that's your opinion. And without evidence it'll remain a non-factual opinion.
  • 0

#55 SirSlayer

SirSlayer

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1638 posts
  • LocationUSA
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Leonis

Posted 19 March 2012 - 12:08 PM

I'm talking about dealing with the fact that are things in this world that 1. You don't always get but you want and 2. Some things in life are up to chance. If someones stabbing you no. Don't just sit there. But if you play a game of chance. It was your decision in the first place to do it. So you can't blame the system for your bad/uneducated decision.

Also on the under 18 fact. If you're under 18 then you need you're parents concent to purchase things online via a credit/dxebt card. If you're 16-18 and you have you're own credit/debt card then you probly also earn the money that's charged through it for you're purchases, thus making you competant enough to know games of chance aren't a guarentee.

Anyway I've clearly stated my opinion that in your next quote you will argue that I'm wrong. But that's your opinion. And without evidence it'll remain a non-factual opinion.


Yes you are right, a lot of things in life people won't get that they want. The thing is, when you play ROSE, we aren't trying to play a game of chance, we are trying to play a game of pvp/pve/quests/etc. We also like collecting costumes, not gambling for them. So what you are basically saying is people that choose to take the chance of Lucky spin are bad/uneducated decisions. This just further proves my point, that lucky spin is not a good thing. To say that people that choose to do lucky spin are making bad/uneducated decisions. hmmm.

You are right, you do need the consent to purchase things online if you are under 18. But like anything else, which yes is fault of the parent as well, but still no better of the company to allow the kid to use that money allowed by the parent to gamble for costumes on a game. The parent might/prolly just thinks the kid is using the money for additions to their game, like DLC, or even explained costumes. But I bet if they knew money was going to waste on lucky spin, they wouldn't allow it. Also the 16-18 part of being "competant" to understand things, doesn't factor in to this either. There is law, simple as that. "Oh the boy was 16, but he knew better, so lets let it slide this time" <<< That is not how things work in yet again the "big boy world". By definition Lucky Spin is gambling, anyone under 18 doing so, with whatever money they use to do this gambling, it is still illegal. No different than a 16yr. old sneaking into a casino, still illegal no matter the money, or the situation at hand.

You cannot honestly say that Lucky Spin is not a true form of gambling. A minor using this system, is an illegal system by any way it can be looked at.

My hopes is not to bash, sue, or some outrageous thing be done. Just get rid of Lucky Spin, it is quite simple. If you want to sell costumes, then sell them. Don't waste peoples money.
  • 0

#56 BobDylan

BobDylan

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 151 posts
  • LocationUSA
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Draconis

Posted 19 March 2012 - 12:58 PM

I think SirSlayer has a valid argument about the efficacy of having a slot machine game mechanic, that requires real currency to use, in a game that is rated for people 10 years old and up. we can debate all day about the intelligence or lack thereof that is required for an individual to actually use such an unfair system, but it does not take away from the fact that gravity is very much encouraging children to gamble their or their parent's money. This game mechanic is much different from the refining system because while you can spend Money on IM items specifically meant for the refining system, those items increase the chance or probability that your refined attempt will be successful. In other words, the IM refining items have a preset value to the player, while Lucky spins do not.

furthermore, ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense!
Why would a Wookiee, an 8-foot-tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of 2-foot-tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I go by the name Bob Dylan and play a slowly dying MMO that lets kids gamble their money away, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must get rid of the lucky spin system! The defense rests
  • 3

#57 jerremy

jerremy

    Knight Representative

  • Members
  • 6045 posts
  • LocationYour closet.
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Currently unknown

Posted 19 March 2012 - 01:00 PM

Was expecting a long arguement when i read the new block of text.
Then i saw Chewbacca..
BobDylan has won the arguement.
  • 1

#58 SirSlayer

SirSlayer

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1638 posts
  • LocationUSA
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Leonis

Posted 19 March 2012 - 01:54 PM

I think SirSlayer has a valid argument about the efficacy of having a slot machine game mechanic, that requires real currency to use, in a game that is rated for people 10 years old and up. we can debate all day about the intelligence or lack thereof that is required for an individual to actually use such an unfair system, but it does not take away from the fact that gravity is very much encouraging children to gamble their or their parent's money. This game mechanic is much different from the refining system because while you can spend Money on IM items specifically meant for the refining system, those items increase the chance or probability that your refined attempt will be successful. In other words, the IM refining items have a preset value to the player, while Lucky spins do not.

furthermore, ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense!
Why would a Wookiee, an 8-foot-tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of 2-foot-tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I go by the name Bob Dylan and play a slowly dying MMO that lets kids gamble their money away, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must get rid of the lucky spin system! The defense rests


Thank you, finally someone understands what I'm saying.

Was expecting a long argument when i read the new block of text.
Then i saw Chewbacca..
BobDylan has won the argument.


I wish people didn't see these as arguments, rather than debates with strong opinions.

However, I will say.....BobDylan you won the "argument" with your Chewbacca explanation.
  • 0

#59 jerremy

jerremy

    Knight Representative

  • Members
  • 6045 posts
  • LocationYour closet.
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Currently unknown

Posted 19 March 2012 - 02:11 PM

I think SirSlayer has a valid argument about the efficacy of having a slot machine game mechanic, that requires real currency to use, in a game that is rated for people 10 years old and up. we can debate all day about the intelligence or lack thereof that is required for an individual to actually use such an unfair system, but it does not take away from the fact that gravity is very much encouraging children to gamble their or their parent's money. This game mechanic is much different from the refining system because while you can spend Money on IM items specifically meant for the refining system, those items increase the chance or probability that your refined attempt will be successful. In other words, the IM refining items have a preset value to the player, while Lucky spins do not.

furthermore, ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense!
Why would a Wookiee, an 8-foot-tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of 2-foot-tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I go by the name Bob Dylan and play a slowly dying MMO that lets kids gamble their money away, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must get rid of the lucky spin system! The defense rests

Thank you, finally someone understands what I'm saying.



I wish people didn't see these as arguments, rather than debates with strong opinions.

However, I will say.....BobDylan you won the "argument" with your Chewbacca explanation.

Only reason i used the word argument.
  • 0

#60 SirSlayer

SirSlayer

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1638 posts
  • LocationUSA
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Leonis

Posted 19 March 2012 - 02:16 PM

;)
  • 0

#61 jerremy

jerremy

    Knight Representative

  • Members
  • 6045 posts
  • LocationYour closet.
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Currently unknown

Posted 19 March 2012 - 02:17 PM

Didn't expect anyone to go as far as to say something about my choice of words, thought everyone would get the point. Yeah, debate would have indeed been better, oh well.. argument's fair enough for me ;)
  • 0

#62 SirSlayer

SirSlayer

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1638 posts
  • LocationUSA
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Leonis

Posted 19 March 2012 - 02:28 PM

Sorry :/
  • 0

#63 RagingHormones

RagingHormones

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 733 posts
  • Playing:Pogo's Lounge

Posted 19 March 2012 - 07:58 PM

furthermore, ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense!
Why would a Wookiee, an 8-foot-tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of 2-foot-tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I go by the name Bob Dylan and play a slowly dying MMO that lets kids gamble their money away, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must get rid of the lucky spin system! The defense rests


*slow clap*





*audience rises*








*standing ovation*
  • 0

#64 Feuer

Feuer

    They pay me to post

  • Members
  • 10958 posts
  • Twitter:@LovatianOwl
  • LocationCaves of Owlverick
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Le' Forumz

Posted 20 March 2012 - 01:42 AM

If you want pvp/pve quests etc and to collect costumes. And rose has a system that makes only certain types of itmes available through a raffle type event [yea ill use a raffle instead of gambling cause its the same thing but they use raffle for charities so it doesn't sound negatibe] then obviously rose isn't gonna be the game you want. Might I suggest something like ... oh wait. Almost every game has a chance system in it. Darn. But it won't matter what anyone sais to you you'll either twist their words, use opinion instead of facts or simply divert the topic around your obstacles. Have you ever thought about what you're asking? If they remove lucky spin and make all item mall tradable [just another. Suggestion that's floating around here] they would be forced to go back to pay to play. You want that? Cause remember' most of the player base is underaged peoples. They would need a monthly payment. Most children don't get stuff like that. So in effect.

If
You remove lucky spin you cut the companies revenue
Removing trade restrictions on item mall items
Gravity now doesn't make budget.
Game shutsdown and moves to p2p
Majority of rose community quits.
Gravity either recovers the rose player base or drops the game
Should it drop congrats. But they won't do the first thing I listed

Why?
Say you're looking at a bed. [Looking to play a game]
You don't like memory foam but like box springs. No particular reason its just the way you feel or is a certain value you have. [This case you like costumes but don't like gambling/chance/random]
You find a store that only sells memory foam. One sells box springs and memory foam [game is all based on random chance like monster drops {wow is an example} or random chance item mall and lucky spin]
What do you do? You compramise
You take the distributor that can give you what you personally value but also distributes what you don't want [this case being rose since item mall rates are flat lucky spin random chance and both places have matresses I mean items you get drop playing]

But go ahead and point out that a matress retailer isn't comparable to a game. And ill just point out that a games entire network of random chance systems that it uses the synthesize the real world mechanics of life we experience each day isn't comparable to a slot machine in a casino. I'm out honestly people who can't remain open minded and realize its a game not a casino poker table just frusterate me when they neir say that I'm wrong because it doesn't exactly fit same cicumstances. Have fun whining about a game that you're perfectly capable of not playing. And I know you'll turn it around when I say this but hell I'm gonna say it. You don't like something don't do it. You want something a company has guess what you have to go by the company policy to get it. You don't go to mc donalds, order a big mac and tell them you'd rather pay a different price and haggle with them. You have to freedom to play or not play. Yeah I said it. You don't like lucky chance then don't use it. You don't condone gravity for having it don't play rose.

Edited by Feuer, 20 March 2012 - 01:52 AM.

  • 0

#65 Feuer

Feuer

    They pay me to post

  • Members
  • 10958 posts
  • Twitter:@LovatianOwl
  • LocationCaves of Owlverick
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Le' Forumz

Posted 20 March 2012 - 01:59 AM

Personally id prefer rose to go p2p btw. Just seemed better back then.
  • 0

#66 SirSlayer

SirSlayer

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1638 posts
  • LocationUSA
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Leonis

Posted 20 March 2012 - 09:11 AM

I'm not twisting anyone's words. I think I've been pretty blunt on what I say the entire time. It is funny how you think that Lucky Spin is what keeps this company in business. You fail to remember they have 3-4 other games. Also just because "other games" have chance systems, doesn't make it right either. This isn't about profits, this is about what is right and wrong. Yet you are the one who goes about every other thing about Lucky Spin, other than the fact that it is just plain wrong to let kids gamble...or wait...raffle. smh lol. If Lucky Spin is Gravity's main form of profits in their entire business, that is quite sad and proves they are doing a lot wrong. If it is their main profits for just ROSE that also proves they are doing something wrong, they have a diamond in the rough(ROSE), that people love so much that they stick it out and keep playing through all the BS they keep dishing out with these updates, and they refuse to clean that diamond up and give the customer what they want. There are many ways they can easily make profits off this game and not have to use Lucky Spin, but why do they keep using Lucky Spin? IT'S EASY! It suckers kids/people in, thinking they have the chance to get something at a fair price...like any gamb...I mean raffle :).

Your mattress theory that you think I'm gonna twist around, I'm not. I'm gonna tell you what more and more Lucky Spin suckers are doing now day by day. They shop at this "mattress" store in hopes that at least one damn time they will get what they want, and after asking and asking and asking, this so called VALUED mattress seller to finally get what they want, they still don't. How valued can anyone/anything be when they simply refuse to care about what you want. If in the end the "mattress company" couldn't afford to do that, that is one thing. But then you are just saying that ROSE can't afford to rid away Lucky Spin....really?! I highly doubt this company's main resource of income is Lucky Spin, and if it is....that is sad. Your main source of income is children/peoples gambling. smh -.-.

I'll say one more time, you can throw 20 more comparisons, you can prove that it is there main source of income,....none of that matters to me for the simple fact of what matters is that there is right and wrong. Gambling for children is wrong, and gambling for people that just want to play a pvp/pve/costume collecting/etc. game, is just annoyingly stupid.
  • 0

#67 BobDylan

BobDylan

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 151 posts
  • LocationUSA
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Draconis

Posted 20 March 2012 - 01:14 PM

If you want pvp/pve quests etc and to collect costumes. And rose has a system that makes only certain types of itmes available through a raffle type event [yea ill use a raffle instead of gambling cause its the same thing but they use raffle for charities so it doesn't sound negatibe] then obviously rose isn't gonna be the game you want.


I'm guessing that you're talking about the Lucky spin system here, but “raffle?” A rose is still a rose by any other name my friend. Furthermore, underage individuals are still not allowed to participate in a charity raffle because it's a form of gambling. Besides the discussion is around a slot machine like game mechanic not a raffle like game mechanic.

Might I suggest something like ... oh wait. Almost every game has a chance system in it. Darn.


I'd like to see this list of games that have a game mechanic that functions and resembles a traditional gambling apparatus. However, I don't imagine that you mean that other games have slot machines that you use real money in, but you are implying it. Instead, I believe what you're doing is confusing or lumping together normal RPG game mechanics, like monster drops, with item mall based gambling mechanisms. This is of course absurd unless gravity decides that players need to spend IM points to deal damage to monsters. Then you might have an argument, but then again you still would not because monster drops would then carry with them the same charge of unethical behavior that has been voiced against the Lucky Spin system.

But it won't matter what anyone sais to you you'll either twist their words, use opinion instead of facts or simply divert the topic around your obstacles.


Oh yeah, that's exactly why I'm dissecting your argument and meticulously answering every component. (WARNING!!! "Implied sarcasm" can lead to episodes of rage in people with opposing viewpoints. Side effects of this rage can include grammatical errors, bouts of illogical rants, and anal leakage. If these or other symptoms persist please seek medical help.)

Have you ever thought about what you're asking?


What is being discussed here is the efficacy of having a game mechanic that requires currency translated into IM points to operate this game mechanic, exactly like tokens at a casino, in a game rated E for everyone.

If they remove lucky spin and make all item mall tradable [just another. Suggestion that's floating around here] they would be forced to go back to pay to play. You want that? Cause remember' most of the player base is underaged peoples. They would need a monthly payment. Most children don't get stuff like that. So in effect.


Why are you trying to muddy the waters of this discussion with another very separate discussion? It doesn't make any sense at all, and I already illustrated quite clearly where that ends up.
I really don't think that this discussion will end with the removal of this IM mechanic. In fact, I would say that Gravity has done its homework and consulted their legal department about the legal implications of having a slot machine in the game. Besides if it wasn't legal than Chuck E. Cheese's wouldn't have those infernal four-color roulette wheels, by the way if you're searching for a parallel in the real world to the Lucky spin system this is it. No mattresses needed.
However, the issue of legality does not absolve the need for ethical practices, and that is why we are having this discussion right now. Another problem with your argument here is that it is a fallacy to assume that the removal of the Lucky spin system will result in a regression back to the days of pay to play.

If
You remove lucky spin you cut the companies revenue
Removing trade restrictions on item mall items
Gravity now doesn't make budget.
Game shutsdown and moves to p2p
Majority of rose community quits.
Gravity either recovers the rose player base or drops the game
Should it drop congrats. But they won't do the first thing I listed


Another slippery slope fallacy and not a very good one since you invalidate it with your final sentence

Why?
Say you're looking at a bed. [Looking to play a game]
You don't like memory foam but like box springs. No particular reason its just the way you feel or is a certain value you have. [This case you like costumes but don't like gambling/chance/random]
You find a store that only sells memory foam. One sells box springs and memory foam [game is all based on random chance like monster drops {wow is an example} or random chance item mall and lucky spin]
What do you do? You compramise
You take the distributor that can give you what you personally value but also distributes what you don't want [this case being rose since item mall rates are flat lucky spin random chance and both places have matresses I mean items you get drop playing]

But go ahead and point out that a matress retailer isn't comparable to a game. And ill just point out that a games entire network of random chance systems that it uses the synthesize the real world mechanics of life we experience each day isn't comparable to a slot machine in a casino. I'm out honestly people who can't remain open minded and realize its a game not a casino poker table just frusterate me when they neir say that I'm wrong because it doesn't exactly fit same cicumstances. Have fun whining about a game that you're perfectly capable of not playing. And I know you'll turn it around when I say this but hell I'm gonna say it. You don't like something don't do it. You want something a company has guess what you have to go by the company policy to get it. You don't go to mc donalds, order a big mac and tell them you'd rather pay a different price and haggle with them. You have to freedom to play or not play. Yeah I said it. You don't like lucky chance then don't use it. You don't condone gravity for having it don't play rose.


I think that you’re… Wait… Mattresses? Store? That doesn't make any sense. Everybody knows there are no mattress stores on Endor, and even if there were do you think that they'd have a bed long enough for poor Chewbacca? Of course not. Ladies and gentlemen why would a planet of 2 foot tall Ewoks make mattresses large enough to accommodate an 8 foot tall Wookiee. It wouldn't make any sense. None of it makes any sense. Ladies and gentlemen of the supposed jury we are left once again wondering what if anything this has to do with the case. And once again I must say nothing. It has nothing to do with the case at hand. It just doesn't make any sense. I suppose Chewbacca could have Han Solo, captain of the millennium falcon, smuggle a luxurious memory foam mattress onto the planet, but I propose that chance or probability would not factor into this because everyone knows that Corellians don't believe in odds. But, still even with all of that said it still makes no sense that a Wookiee would want to live on Endor and as such my previous conclusion stands.

Oh and one more thing when I go to McDonald's and order a big Mac and I don't like the price I use a coupon.
  • 0

#68 Genesis

Genesis

    ROSE Developer

  • Community Managers
  • 2066 posts
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Arua

Posted 20 March 2012 - 01:31 PM

When I look at the system which drives the Lucky Spin, I see this, but not this. Gambling implies the chance of 1) failure/receiving nothing in return and 2) receiving something of lesser value. With the Lucky Spin, you are guaranteed to get an item which is of equivalent, or greater value than the cost of a "Spin".
  • 0

#69 BobDylan

BobDylan

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 151 posts
  • LocationUSA
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Draconis

Posted 20 March 2012 - 01:47 PM

When I look at the system which drives the Lucky Spin, I see this, but not this. Gambling implies the chance of 1) failure/receiving nothing in return and 2) receiving something of lesser value. With the Lucky Spin, you are guaranteed to get an item which is of equivalent, or greater value than the cost of a "Spin".


Nice, much better than mattresses. I could concede that you have me with this argument.

I do still question how valuable shoes and gloves are when you got 10 of them without any other part of the set. Also, technically speaking while you can disassemble these items it takes the disassembly of several items to equal one spin, so does that still make an item worth the equivalent or greater value of a spin?
  • 0

#70 SirSlayer

SirSlayer

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1638 posts
  • LocationUSA
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Leonis

Posted 20 March 2012 - 02:12 PM

When I look at the system which drives the Lucky Spin, I see this, but not this. Gambling implies the chance of 1) failure/receiving nothing in return and 2) receiving something of lesser value. With the Lucky Spin, you are guaranteed to get an item which is of equivalent, or greater value than the cost of a "Spin".


I can agree with you on this to a degree. When you get a gumball, you get a gumball. When you do Lucky Spin, 9/10 you get a the crappy piece. Now you can say that if gumball red is most valued but you get mainly blue and white gumballs, its still gumballs. But in this situation you are needing to complete a set, you aren't getting 1/5 of the gumball, you are getting the whole gumball...no matter the end products color(costume). To fairly compare the two, Lucky Spin would have to give a full costume each spin, just like you get a FULL gumball each spin in a gumball machine.

Also like BobDylan said, I don't think the value of the end result of each spin are the same, as if you disassemble each piece, for certain ones, you get different coin amounts, which in the end, if you keep NOT getting what you want, and keep disassembling(this has happened to me), you do ultimately fail and not get the completed thing you went for.

So in all with Lucky Spin you can 1) have a chance at failure/receiving nothing at all(I do not consider PARTS of a costume a prize,... half a gumball is not a prize), 2) you can recieve something of lesser value as the costume you want may be not the costume you end up getting(lesser value), and if you end up not getting a full costume as everyone knows in the ROSE market, no costume in this game is worth as much if it does not come in the full set. If I sell 3/5 pieces of a costume in a shop, the worth goes down. (also again disassembling and getting lesser amounts of coins compared to other parts, is also of lesser value).

I will say that your "argument" Genesis is way better than some I've had on this subject so far, and you did it simply with two pictures lol.
  • 1

#71 Calanor

Calanor

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Retired
  • 2474 posts
  • LocationBetween 2 Rainbows
  • Playing:ROSE Online

Posted 20 March 2012 - 02:52 PM

Nice, much better than mattresses. I could concede that you have me with this argument.

I do still question how valuable shoes and gloves are when you got 10 of them without any other part of the set. Also, technically speaking while you can disassemble these items it takes the disassembly of several items to equal one spin, so does that still make an item worth the equivalent or greater value of a spin?


Without making a big deal about it, we have changed up the rate of the shoes and gloves in the past.
I will continue to play with it and see some balancing acts done with it.

Cal
  • 2

#72 Krackel

Krackel

    I made it Off Topic

  • Members
  • 54 posts
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Draconis

Posted 20 March 2012 - 02:55 PM

Good! I like all of them.
  • 0

#73 Feuer

Feuer

    They pay me to post

  • Members
  • 10958 posts
  • Twitter:@LovatianOwl
  • LocationCaves of Owlverick
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Le' Forumz

Posted 20 March 2012 - 05:59 PM

Oh yeah, that's exactly why I'm dissecting your argument and meticulously answering every component. (WARNING!!! "Implied sarcasm" can lead to episodes of rage in people with opposing viewpoints. Side effects of this rage can include grammatical errors, bouts of illogical rants, and anal leakage. If these or other symptoms persist please seek medical help.)


Grammatical errors. That would be my not-so-smart phone auto correcting my text while it was off screen.
Illogical. You can only prove something to be illogical if it is factual, and opinions [which is what i've been stating them to be] are not. Neither is anyone else's opinions.
Anal leakage. Really? This coming from someone who compares illogical things like endor chewbacca and rose in one sentence. I do believe you contradicted your self by doing that immediately after posted about illogical opinions. >.> -claps-

on Another note, The refine system is more of a gamble then lucky spin, Genesis has a point, no matter what it lands on, you get something. You get a box from IM, its a "gamble". you go hunting for drops, its a gamble. What you fail to realize is with gambling you have a chance to fail. With anything [with exception to refining] you will come out of it with something.

anyway, I've broken my word twice now, so i'll try to leave this topic i need to focus on other efforts than arguing with someone who can't agree to disagree and his disrespectful pet troll.
  • 0

#74 SirSlayer

SirSlayer

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1638 posts
  • LocationUSA
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Leonis

Posted 20 March 2012 - 06:13 PM

Grammatical errors. That would be my not-so-smart phone auto correcting my text while it was off screen.
Illogical. You can only prove something to be illogical if it is factual, and opinions [which is what i've been stating them to be] are not. Neither is anyone else's opinions.
Anal leakage. Really? This coming from someone who compares illogical things like endor chewbacca and rose in one sentence. I do believe you contradicted your self by doing that immediately after posted about illogical opinions. >.> -claps-

on Another note, The refine system is more of a gamble then lucky spin, Genesis has a point, no matter what it lands on, you get something. You get a box from IM, its a "gamble". you go hunting for drops, its a gamble. What you fail to realize is with gambling you have a chance to fail. With anything [with exception to refining] you will come out of it with something.

anyway, I've broken my word twice now, so i'll try to leave this topic i need to focus on other efforts than arguing with someone who can't agree to disagree and his disrespectful pet troll.


You compared ROSE to a mattress store lol. I think the comparison thing here is all thrown off.

Yes you get something from each spin, but there is no definite on what you get....therefore still a gamble.

When you go hunting for drops, is it a gamble or ratio based? Hmmm, I think we should ask a DEV on that, cause I'm sure it is ratio based to some degree. If monster drops are a gamble then there is the chance an epic would NEVER drop again....right?

What you are saying is that Lucky Spin you have no chance to fail, but many people fail at it constantly and don't get what they want, they get pieces....you sound like you never do Lucky Spin. How is it not a gamble the fact that it costs $10 one day to get a full costume, and over $60 the next if you want?

Genesis does have a point but the comparison of gumball machine to Lucky Spin while similar is not the same thing. Like I've said before, when you get a gumball no matter the one you get, you still get a FULL gumball, not a piece of a gumball(or at least I hope you wouldn't cause then you got a fudged up gumball machine lol).

Also, who is the pet troll here? Me? BobDylan? ...or Chewbacca? lol.
  • 0

#75 TruPain

TruPain

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 728 posts
  • LocationMEnTal iNstItUtiOn
  • Playing:ROSE Online

Posted 20 March 2012 - 06:18 PM

on Another note, The refine system is more of a gamble then lucky spin, Genesis has a point, no matter what it lands on, you get something. You get a box from IM, its a "gamble". you go hunting for drops, its a gamble. What you fail to realize is with gambling you have a chance to fail. With anything [with exception to refining] you will come out of it with something.


Only thing I want to say here is that I would like to see the odds slightly better at least or always have the items available to vend... getting 7-9 pairs of gloves/shoes out of every 10 spins is a little extreme in my opinion... and I have to admit, I am very unlucky and it takes me a lot to get a full outfit...

okay.. I lied.. this is the last I want to say... then I will leave this topic alone as well...
I am glad that Calanor said they were looking into that... and yes... I would never do the lucky spin if there was a chance that I would get nothing... because with my luck... I would get nothing 7 out of 10 spins... since there isn't a null item I guess you can't compare it to real casino gambling in those terms... but you do, in the long run have a chance to end up with nothing... how so you may ask?

I buy 3 spins... I get items I already have that are not vendable/tradable so I disassemble those items... Wow! I got lucky spin coins now... too bad it takes 5 of those to get 1 spin back and most of the items I get during the lucky spin are worth either 2 or 3 lucky spin coins... so we'll say they are worth 3 just because... so I now have 9 lucky spin coins, I use 1 for a spin and get yet another shoe... so I repeat and now I have 6 coins... spin again and yet another shoe... disassemble and WTF... now I only have 4 coins... and I can't do anything with those coins unless I do what... oh yeah... buy more spins... point rested...

I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must get rid of the lucky spin system! The defense rests


Nice south park reference!


.:edit:.
I would like to add that though I didn't count well in the above reference... I am sure many people have ended up with extra coins... so though my math wasn't correct... I hope you got my point...
.:/edit:.

Edited by TruPain, 20 March 2012 - 06:31 PM.

  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users