working as intended?
Edited by SirDouglas, 31 May 2012 - 09:32 AM.
Posted 31 May 2012 - 09:24 AM
Edited by SirDouglas, 31 May 2012 - 09:32 AM.
Posted 01 June 2012 - 11:12 AM
Posted 01 June 2012 - 11:22 AM
Edited by GuardianTK, 01 June 2012 - 11:23 AM.
Posted 01 June 2012 - 11:30 AM
Posted 01 June 2012 - 11:35 AM
Posted 03 June 2012 - 11:15 AM
I don't see this on the Balance Patch notes anywhere.Success rate = 5%*(shield refine)
Posted 03 June 2012 - 05:55 PM
Edited by CeruleanGamer, 03 June 2012 - 05:55 PM.
Posted 03 June 2012 - 07:04 PM
Posted 03 June 2012 - 07:16 PM
Posted 03 June 2012 - 07:54 PM
Edited by Ralis, 03 June 2012 - 07:59 PM.
Posted 03 June 2012 - 08:17 PM
5% with a Mailbreaker is not as brokenly powerful compared to 100%, Ralis. Good god. Even 50% is already high enough with PPA for any other gear. Only RG's can wear a viable unbreakable shield compared to all other classes.Why does it matter? If it's not RG, it's going to be an RK with a mailbreaker, a SC with a mailbreaker, a Gen, a Mech, etc.
There are so many classes / skills that break gear anymore that the simple solution is to just not have gear that can break. =/
Sure, remove it though, I'd like to use my +120 Attack buff from SS1. =)
edit;
It does not work with Reflect, BTW, but any other AoE will do. Moonslasher, Overbrand, etc.
Edited by GuardianTK, 03 June 2012 - 08:19 PM.
Posted 03 June 2012 - 08:41 PM
Posted 04 June 2012 - 10:06 AM
Posted 04 June 2012 - 10:25 AM
One of them will review this issue and see if it is a confirmed bug after contacting kRO. From there we request a "fix." As for how long it would take for the fix and whether we'll even know if we're getting it through some ninja patch from kRO, nobody knows.what the gms/dev team will do about it?
Edited by GuardianTK, 04 June 2012 - 10:25 AM.
Posted 02 September 2012 - 07:43 AM
Edited by SirDouglas, 02 September 2012 - 07:48 AM.
Posted 02 September 2012 - 09:20 PM
Posted 27 September 2012 - 04:20 PM
Posted 27 September 2012 - 04:41 PM
Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:29 PM
Posted 28 September 2012 - 07:19 AM
Posted 01 November 2012 - 11:03 AM
Posted 01 November 2012 - 11:40 AM
Posted 01 November 2012 - 04:47 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users