am i right with my katar raider stat build? - Hawker Class - WarpPortal Community Forums

Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

am i right with my katar raider stat build?


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 sforstun

sforstun

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 446 posts
  • Locationmanila PH
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:DRACC!

Posted 09 July 2012 - 05:24 AM

any opinions will do :D specially contructive criticisms :D

just took my free reset from darren in junon after i got 220 and i made this build str 100, dex 400, con 140, sen 145

btw for the title of the topic, i know theres no perfect build but how do you think this build will do in pvp with a decent set?
  • 0

#2 jerremy

jerremy

    Knight Representative

  • Members
  • 6045 posts
  • LocationYour closet.
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Currently unknown

Posted 09 July 2012 - 05:49 AM

Too much into dex, not enough con. There's no exact values ofcourse, but putting stats to 400 is bad in most builds, as it costs way too much stat points.
Get enough dex to wear epic katars (I believe this was 342). Con, 220-250 if you want to be sure not to miss all too much. You can put less con and more into str and sen (your choice), but it'll do less against other raiders and scouts, due to less accuracy.
I'm not sure how it will do in pvp, but I do not recommend the build the way I see it now. Though ofcourse, it depends on how you play. Best option is to test out a few builds and see what goes best.
  • 0

#3 sforstun

sforstun

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 446 posts
  • Locationmanila PH
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:DRACC!

Posted 09 July 2012 - 06:41 AM

Too much into dex, not enough con. There's no exact values ofcourse, but putting stats to 400 is bad in most builds, as it costs way too much stat points.
Get enough dex to wear epic katars (I believe this was 342). Con, 220-250 if you want to be sure not to miss all too much. You can put less con and more into str and sen (your choice), but it'll do less against other raiders and scouts, due to less accuracy.
I'm not sure how it will do in pvp, but I do not recommend the build the way I see it now. Though ofcourse, it depends on how you play. Best option is to test out a few builds and see what goes best.



thanks jeremy, got to save another 260m to buy a stat reset scroll LOL
  • 0

#4 sforstun

sforstun

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 446 posts
  • Locationmanila PH
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:DRACC!

Posted 09 July 2012 - 06:52 AM

how bout this jeremy, 350 dex, 230 con for the remainder ill put 50%str and sen?
  • 0

#5 Zova

Zova

    I made it Off Topic

  • Members
  • 48 posts

Posted 11 July 2012 - 11:52 AM

Honestly i think str is almost useless for raiders. The only reason hawkers put str into their builds is because it costs a lot less to go from 15-100 on str than go from 340-360 on dex. But you do not need to put anymore dex than 342. those 8 points to get to 350 could go a long ways else where. As mentioned, it depends on the priority of your build. If you want to be a raider vs raider build then your gonna need a lot of con. The more traditional build calls for almost a 1to1 ratio on con/sen. When your maxed out i don't really think 10 stat points here instead of there will make much difference if not any at all.

Edited by Zova, 11 July 2012 - 12:04 PM.

  • 0

#6 ShadowF0X

ShadowF0X

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 330 posts
  • LocationSunny England
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Draconics

Posted 12 July 2012 - 12:18 AM

Just keep that build for PvM and make another raider, saves you 200M+ and you get a nice shiny new Character to play with :)
  • 0

#7 sforstun

sforstun

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 446 posts
  • Locationmanila PH
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:DRACC!

Posted 12 July 2012 - 10:57 AM

Just keep that build for PvM and make another raider, saves you 200M+ and you get a nice shiny new Character to play with :)



i think i will do this. btw thanks for all of you're opinion guys

Edited by sforstun, 12 July 2012 - 10:59 AM.

  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users