Damage dealing effects - Page 2 - Proposals & Suggestions - WarpPortal Community Forums

Jump to content


Photo
* * * * - 3 votes

Damage dealing effects


  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#26 Phish

Phish

    Bourgeois & Champion Representative

  • Members
  • 3564 posts
  • LocationU.S.A. New York
  • Playing:Nothing

Posted 29 September 2010 - 11:49 AM

Woah a quintuple post, Blitzkrieg I think yo umay be the one who has gone insane.
  • 0

#27 Silwok

Silwok

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 416 posts

Posted 29 September 2010 - 11:51 AM

Woah a quintuple post, Blitzkrieg I think you may be the one who has gone insane.

Thats what I was just thinking 0.0
  • 0

#28 youichi

youichi

    I made it Off Topic

  • Members
  • 44 posts
  • LocationTokyo, Japan

Posted 30 September 2010 - 04:17 AM

Although some of his suggestions is helpful, frankly i don`t like that person, especially his posts here in this section.
He`s like.. :p_err:
  • 0

#29 Irtofu

Irtofu

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 216 posts
  • Location21º 18' N, 157º 51' W

Posted 01 October 2010 - 12:03 AM

Although some of his suggestions is helpful, frankly i don`t like that person, especially his posts here in this section.
He`s like.. :p_err:


um im not sure what you are talking about, I am just trying to address a problem I see, and what part dont you like? for all the negative responses, I have provided my reasoning for.
  • 0

#30 Irtofu

Irtofu

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 216 posts
  • Location21º 18' N, 157º 51' W

Posted 01 October 2010 - 12:05 AM

U HAVE GONE INSANE........
THE TOPIC OF THE MOST WAS BURN/POISON
as you see these skills do damage per second
so considering a raider using skills of 1k damage per sec an 8sec burn only increases their AP by 500 for 8 secs


and according to your theory, is that not a lot? 1k damage per sec, and ap? I do not see how AP is related to the topic. But anyways according to you if they really do 1k damage, which is not the case, 500 damage more is a 50% addition, would you not say that is a lot?
  • 0

#31 youichi

youichi

    I made it Off Topic

  • Members
  • 44 posts
  • LocationTokyo, Japan

Posted 01 October 2010 - 03:16 AM

um im not sure what you are talking about, I am just trying to address a problem I see, and what part dont you like? for all the negative responses, I have provided my reasoning for.


I`m not talking about you sir. I`m referring to Blitzkrieg :p_err:
  • 0

#32 ChickenBucket

ChickenBucket

    Bourgeois Representative

  • Members
  • 1175 posts
  • LocationPuerto Rico
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Poo'onis

Posted 01 October 2010 - 07:14 AM

Blitz is a noob and doesn't know what he is talking about 85% of the time, i don't even know why do you even bother answering him.. he doesnt even have a lvl 200 char anyways
  • 0

#33 poopiehead

poopiehead

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 944 posts

Posted 01 October 2010 - 07:22 AM

Blitz is a noob and doesn't know what he is talking about 85% of the time, i don't even know why do you even bother answering him.. he doesnt even have a lvl 200 char anyways

oh no u didnt :p_devil:
  • 0

#34 Irtofu

Irtofu

    Amateur Blogger

  • Members
  • 216 posts
  • Location21º 18' N, 157º 51' W

Posted 01 October 2010 - 01:20 PM

I`m not talking about you sir. I`m referring to Blitzkrieg :p_devil:


oh ok:) well anyways, if anyone got anymore suggestions post them! phish had a really good one
  • 0

#35 Blitzkrieg

Blitzkrieg

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 515 posts
  • LocationIndia-Mumbai

Posted 08 October 2010 - 03:01 AM

FOR ALL THE CRITISISM
@irtofu
sry.........the post was never meant to be that way
i meant to say that mages will generally have higher def than raiders cuz raiders dont generally have DEF on thier priority list as Dodge/ap/aspd/Acc are more important but A MAGE wud directly go for DEF/HP after he gets himself good AP ...alos since a mage uses chiva he will have have higher DEF than a glorious/dark using raider...(m only refering to katars duals is a different story al together)...yes a chiva using katar will have higher def than a mage but it wont be that common to see 1

also mage has mute +burn(not sure) so the match raider vs mage is pretty much balanced
considering mute reduces skill damage AP + the the burn AP + the debuffs that u might cast


I DIDNT MEAN TO MAKE ALL THOSE 5 POSTS....it was the day the forums went down so i didnt realise i had made all those posts

@phish,silwok
i wud say the same thing of some1 else made so many posts

@chicken bucket
I HAVE 200 CHAR .... just that i havent updated my siggy ..my bourg is 200+
the reason i dont lvl up is cuz m making all jobs simultaneously as i dont wanna buy 200 sets ....m waiting till the new sets come
and it wud be better to have em all at around 180 and lvl them later after orlo 2 when ppl will flock prison/DOD/MC
as for the rest of it...... http://forums.warppo...tyle_emoticons/default/icon_puppyeye.gif:icon_puppyeye:

@Youichi
nvm......datz the way i m
plz expand on what u meant by :angry:
ill try to change.....:(

.................................................................
also as i said i liked phish's suggestion
.................................................................
  • 0

#36 Span

Span

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 716 posts
  • LocationNot a clue ...
  • Playing:Nothing

Posted 08 October 2010 - 09:22 AM

.................................................................
also as i said i liked phish's suggestion
.................................................................


Me too :angry:

Woah a quintuple post, Blitzkrieg I think yo umay be the one who has gone insane.


  • 0

#37 PickUp

PickUp

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 1774 posts
  • LocationNowhereland
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Forums

Posted 08 October 2010 - 09:30 AM

i dont wanna buy 200 sets ....m waiting till the new sets come


Did anyone else found this statement "funny" in a way?










Most likely we'll have those sets out in 2016.
  • 2

#38 Span

Span

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 716 posts
  • LocationNot a clue ...
  • Playing:Nothing

Posted 08 October 2010 - 09:31 AM

New armours will come out when im lvl 999 .
  • 0

#39 poopiehead

poopiehead

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 944 posts

Posted 08 October 2010 - 10:13 AM

Did anyone else found this statement "funny" in a way?










Most likely we'll have those sets out in 2016.


i just went "you may as well quit..." in my head

Edited by poopiehead, 08 October 2010 - 10:14 AM.

  • 0

#40 iBryan

iBryan

    Awarded #1 Troll

  • Members
  • 810 posts
  • LocationNew York
  • Playing:ROSE Online
  • Server:Leonis

Posted 08 October 2010 - 12:58 PM

so dont even mention defence cuz raiders have the lowest DEF


Hm, last time i checked a raider's defense was "DODGE" cause if you know the game that's how it works since it all depends on the persons acc. The skill's damage won't hit full damage.

Also there's nothing to nerf beyond what it should be. Their trying to balance the game, not give more power to other classes. That'll just repeat the whole process.

+1 to Phish
+1 to those who agreed
-1 to the ones who keep crying about nerfing/skills.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users