Crit sorc?
Started by
SuperGlue
, May 30 2013 08:54 PM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 30 May 2013 - 08:54 PM
51/26 or 26/51
do stats not matter end game?
51 Agi = 4.67% crit
51 Int = 100 matk or so?
Crit sorcs seem appealing so that we can crit damage and crit heal or am I foolishly mistaken?
do stats not matter end game?
51 Agi = 4.67% crit
51 Int = 100 matk or so?
Crit sorcs seem appealing so that we can crit damage and crit heal or am I foolishly mistaken?
#2
Posted 30 May 2013 - 09:17 PM
agi stats matter the most.
im a crit sorc myself ^_^
enjoy this video and answer your questions while youre on it
im a crit sorc myself ^_^
enjoy this video and answer your questions while youre on it
#3
Posted 31 May 2013 - 02:47 AM
Ah 3 rangers and 3 sorcs, well that explains the spam of dmg numbers ^^
I am pretty sure a sorc with AoD gear has a huge crit rate
I am pretty sure a sorc with AoD gear has a huge crit rate
#4
Posted 31 May 2013 - 10:05 AM
doenst really matter. 26 agi vs 51 agi aint much crit difference.
#5
Posted 31 May 2013 - 06:30 PM
this is with colo gearAh 3 rangers and 3 sorcs, well that explains the spam of dmg numbers ^^
I am pretty sure a sorc with AoD gear has a huge crit rate
every little agi point counts ^_^doenst really matter. 26 agi vs 51 agi aint much crit difference.
#6
Posted 01 June 2013 - 01:40 AM
True, but I dropped 0,36% crit rate and 8 magic attack for about 100 hp, worth xD (36/36/25)
#7
Posted 01 June 2013 - 06:42 AM
Critical Sorc? It's one of the most efficient build for Sorcerer, it is what define you as the best burst class.
320% in an instant? or 240%? DO WANT.
320% in an instant? or 240%? DO WANT.
#8
Posted 02 June 2013 - 11:47 PM
Int is more valuable that AGI as a stat until ridiculous levels of gear when it comes to both DPS and healing (less so healing). The topic below explains it more in detail.
http://forums.warppo...rds-agi-vs-int/
http://forums.warppo...rds-agi-vs-int/
Edited by Scorpadorp, 04 June 2013 - 03:09 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users