Which Is Better In PvE?

Harlequin or Ranger? I like mobility, decent damage, and locking (pseudo-stunning, I should say) to keep monsters in check, range itself is a nonissue.

Basically, which is easier to get a hang of/more useful overall in both PvE and maybe even PvP? Which would be more useful in a party?

Edited by Tundra, 03 November 2010 - 01:01 PM.

Bump, still no helpful comments? (Not many topics, if any, about Pathfinders vs Jester. D:

Bump, still no helpful comments? (Not many topics, if any, about Pathfinders vs Jester. D:

Harlequin is terribly broken since dragon saga was released (lost ability to hit things on the ground with 2 of their stronger abilities, and they already have several useless ones). Pathfinders and rangers havent changed much

Rangers have a strong attacks with a decent amoung of damage but their cooldowns are way too long (For thq, I dunno if anything has changed here).
Harlequins have a nice AoE, nice attacks with decent damage but lwoer than rangers. If you like stunning you can use rocket punch.

I have played both these classes and I would choose Harlequin if I were you.

Edited by Natalieecn, 14 November 2010 - 04:27 AM.

Rangers have a strong attacks with a decent amoung of damage but their cooldowns are way too long (For thq, I dunno if anything has changed here).
Harlequins have a nice AoE, nice attacks with decent damage but lwoer than rangers. If you like stunning you can use rocket punch.

I have played both these classes and I would choose Harlequin if I were you.

I already have! I love it. But I think I love "infiltrators" more now.