193 aspd Ranger vs 193 Aspd RK
#51
Posted 16 January 2013 - 07:23 PM
If you are purely looking for a high aspd class than Ranger is better than RK. Like everybody posted already, ranged is better than up close.
If you are looking for the best all around class than RK is better. RK is a elite class. Runes, Dragon Breath, High HP, versatility of play style, equips, weapons, ect.....
#52
Posted 16 January 2013 - 08:46 PM
#53
Posted 20 January 2013 - 12:45 PM
advantage and bigger chance of winning.
#54
Posted 20 January 2013 - 02:24 PM
both have their pros and cons tbh. yes rangers have warg. but rks have turisus( +30 str, chance to do 3x dmg). if rks fail to close that range gap, then rangers win. if rks do get close. rks have the
advantage and bigger chance of winning.
Turisus only serves to crush strike in PvP . Vellum Katzbalger is mandatory now and no matter if you have 1 or 120 base STR. A RK with 1 STR, Vellum Katzbalger and WoE Set gives more damage than a 200 STR RK, Full Buffs / Striking / Runes, eATK gears and +14 Glorious Claymore/ +9 Vellum Claymore.
#55
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:00 PM
Turisus only serves to crush strike in PvP . Vellum Katzbalger is mandatory now and no matter if you have 1 or 120 base STR. A RK with 1 STR, Vellum Katzbalger and WoE Set gives more damage than a 200 STR RK, Full Buffs / Striking / Runes, eATK gears and +14 Glorious Claymore/ +9 Vellum Claymore.
Yes we are aware of this since you have mentioned this like 100x already. So finally your class isn't as bad with this weapon. What do you have to say about it now lol?
#56
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:34 PM
#57
Posted 20 January 2013 - 05:51 PM
#58
Posted 20 January 2013 - 06:08 PM
Edited by TheKraven, 20 January 2013 - 06:18 PM.
#59
Posted 20 January 2013 - 06:11 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users