Big LOL to this guy.. If you spent long hours hunting eremes,lapparman dna and some high level dungeons like me and you find out that some players obtained DNA in its counterpart mob which has the same structure to the bosses mentioned, what will you feel? Angry right?. If i were you, dont rely on bugs that wont do any good.
Thats your loss for not finding out. Now that you know, you can still hunt those counterparts to lvl up your summon or whatever. It's like when I didnt do colo because I didnt realise it was better gear than raids - spent long hours raiding for gears, losing dice and finding out people are getting better from doing 20 min colo 3 times per day. Sure I'm a bit angry but I just accept that and move on - having farmed colo I now have 4 pieces of colo equips and 800k bp which I might save for tier 2. Do you think they will do anything about that and change it - remove/nerf colo gear? Obviously not.
And stop calling it a bug - unless you have proof that the developers have confirmed its a bug (developers - not CMs/GMs), then the possibility that it is not a bug exists. You obviously skipped my earlier post where I provided an example from another well-known game where something that should be called a 'bug' is accepted and intended by the developers themselves. Now I'm not saying that it's not a bug either - just that the possibility exists. If you're so certain its a bug then show proof please.
EDIT: Also how would you feel if you were a new player and they changed the drops - already a lot of people have these summons and if its changed now, then its further distancing new players from the old. From a business point of view - they won't lose many players if they just keep things the way they are now - but they may lose a lot of newer players who think they can never catch up. It will be an unfair advantage to everyone else if they change it now. The other solution would be to do a rollback but then people who have spent many hours farming in the last week will possibly quit if this happens. I think it should just be accepted as intended and left in the game as is.
Edited by 5344130512045108620, 13 August 2013 - 11:02 PM.