
HNNNNNNNGGGGGGGHHHHHH
#1
Posted 20 October 2015 - 07:40 PM
#2
Posted 20 October 2015 - 08:22 PM
I need to rewatch the whole series before this goes out in the cinemas.
#3
Posted 20 October 2015 - 08:43 PM
2015 has been a really good year
#4
Posted 21 October 2015 - 06:23 AM
I need to rewatch the whole series before this goes out in the cinemas.
skip eps 1-3
#5
Posted 21 October 2015 - 09:57 AM
It is my most anticipated film of the year, I hope Disney does it justice (in spite of multiple theories of Mickey Mouse and the Jonas siblings making an appearance ^).
#6
Posted 21 October 2015 - 11:11 AM
#8
Posted 21 October 2015 - 05:47 PM
as long as no jarjar and idiotic battle droids. they have the aim of stormtroopers but are as convincing a battle force as the ewoks were (the battle on the the forest moon of endor was also a travesty, but that's neither here nor there).
I have a feeling deep reviews like what Plinkett provided may have acted as a guide among the many criticisms that followed those god awful prequels (and Special Edition versions of the original three movies which made me cringe badly).
#9
Posted 21 October 2015 - 06:49 PM
#10
Posted 21 October 2015 - 07:32 PM
They certainly were "special".
What are you on about? I absolutely LOVED it when I got to the climax of the film to see the ghost of Hayden Christensen instead of Sebastian Shaw, I felt happy knowing he wasn't alive by the end of it ^
#11
Posted 21 October 2015 - 09:33 PM
i heard that the skull of jarjar will be shown as an easter egg. he will still manage to be annoying just by being a skull
#12
Posted 22 October 2015 - 04:49 AM
I have a feeling deep reviews like what Plinkett provided may have acted as a guide among the many criticisms that followed those god awful prequels (and Special Edition versions of the original three movies which made me cringe badly).
i heard that the skull of jarjar will be shown as an easter egg. he will still manage to be annoying just by being a skull
i swear there's a deleted scene from one of the prequels showing jarjar dying when the gungan sub falls off a waterfall after the two jedi disembark. the utter lack of emotion on their faces as this happens reflects audience sentiment.
the special edition version of the original teaser trailer for TFA was hilarious though.
#13
Posted 28 October 2015 - 02:50 PM
And the sequel. (PLOT TWIST)
#14
Posted 03 November 2015 - 10:23 PM
i hope they'll make way for this (or early showing) here in Philippines because we have this lame filmfest thingy on-going on Dec 25 til January and no foreign movies would be shown to give way for it (
#15
Posted 04 November 2015 - 07:06 AM
#16
Posted 05 November 2015 - 01:02 AM
i hope they show it in advance here! (loljk) i'd really watch this on 5D cinema here <3
#17
Posted 05 November 2015 - 04:04 PM
Considering how the new Star Wars movie is coming out in December, this is totally relevant.
#19
Posted 18 November 2015 - 04:04 PM
O.O, when is this supposed to open?!?!?!?!!?!??!!?!?!?!???!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? (Is it even real?)
Sadly looks like it's a fake
Edited by Talvis, 18 November 2015 - 04:07 PM.
#20
Posted 18 November 2015 - 07:48 PM
O.O, when is this supposed to open?!?!?!?!!?!??!!?!?!?!???!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? (Is it even real?)
Sadly looks like it's a fake
It's fake. If it was real, I would think they'd call it Star World instead of Lucas World since it only focuses on the Star Wars franchise and doesn't include Indiana Jones.
#21
Posted 19 November 2015 - 03:55 PM
It's a fun mock up and drawn EXACTLY in the style of an actual Disneyland map. But there's no way Disney is going to put Lucas' name on a land. Tokyo Disney sea actually looks a lot like this
#22
Posted 28 November 2015 - 03:24 PM
There are so many damn people speculating why Lucas has had no input into the new Star Wars films...
This is purely because he sucks at his job without having people challenging him, and the fact is that no one ever did in the prequels, and Disney has learnt this and made a good decision.
#23
Posted 28 November 2015 - 05:19 PM
There are so many damn people speculating why Lucas has had no input into the new Star Wars films...
This is purely because he sucks at his job without having people challenging him, and the fact is that no one ever did in the prequels, and Disney has learnt this and made a good decision.
He doesn't even look intimidating, dunno why people were scared to speak up. Oh well, hope they're happy having their names in the prequels' credits.
#24
Posted 28 November 2015 - 06:24 PM
He doesn't even look intimidating, dunno why people were scared to speak up. Oh well, hope they're happy having their names in the prequels' credits.
He gained a lot of recognition from the original trilogy, people thought of him as a genius when it was a combination of luck, budget and other people which drove to the theatrical release masterpiece, hence why future re-releases started to degrade the quality, because Lucas had the power to edit.
There will only be one [version of the films]. And it won't be what I would call the "rough cut", it'll be the "final cut". The other one will be some sort of interesting artifact that people will look at and say, "There was an earlier draft of this." The same thing happens with plays and earlier drafts of books. In essence, films never get finished, they get abandoned. At some point, you're dragged off the picture kicking and screaming while somebody says, "Okay, it's done." That isn't really the way it should work. Occasionally, [you can] go back and get your cut of the video out there, which I did on both American Graffiti and THX 1138; that's the place where it will live forever. So what ends up being important in my mind is what the DVD version is going to look like, because that's what everybody is going to remember. The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won't last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you'll be able to project it on a 20-foot-by-40-foot screen with perfect quality. I think it's the director's prerogative, not the studio's, to go back and reinvent a movie.
puppy you George.
Edited by Nirvanna21, 28 November 2015 - 06:28 PM.
#25
Posted 30 November 2015 - 10:40 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users