The issue with Fruit Pom Spider card - Ragnarok Online Community Chat - WarpPortal Community Forums

Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

The issue with Fruit Pom Spider card


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 PervySageMarty

PervySageMarty

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 3959 posts
  • LocationUnderground like a wild potato
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 21 February 2017 - 10:48 PM

For those who read that from my testing that Fruit Pom Spider increased fire elemental spell damage to monsters, it has been proven incorrect and according to Ash, a +14 weapon was wasted on this.

 

I deeply apologize for the blunder I have caused (I could have sworn I got very diffferent results when i tested this earlier in the week) as well as wasting a players hardmade weapon.

 

It is as stands that Fruit Pom Spider increases damage towards fire property monsters.

 

Once again I deeply apologize and hope everyone here on the forums can forgive me for this bamboozle.


  • 0

#2 yamasakai90

yamasakai90

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 3030 posts
  • LocationUnder the Ground
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 21 February 2017 - 10:52 PM

It probably has hidden effect but we all know how confusing the card descriptions are.... To fire attack or fire property monsters. These feel like tatacho card all over again.

Don't sweat on it marty...
  • 0

#3 Silvianna

Silvianna

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 2579 posts
  • Location-
  • Playing:Nothing
  • Server:Quit

Posted 21 February 2017 - 10:54 PM

Translation fault  :heh:

 

dont feel sad 

Cheersss ^^


  • 0

#4 BlackMeow

BlackMeow

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 2929 posts
  • LocationTree
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Both

Posted 22 February 2017 - 12:21 AM

wording fail. typical RO description


  • 0

#5 CadburyChocolate

CadburyChocolate

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 3553 posts

Posted 22 February 2017 - 12:38 AM

It probably has hidden effect but we all know how confusing the card descriptions are.... To fire attack or fire property monsters. These feel like tatacho card all over again.

Don't sweat on it marty...

Translation fault  :heh:

 

dont feel sad 

Cheersss ^^

wording fail. typical RO description

To be fair, iRO's description was correct and clear. the doubt arouse when someone saw that the cards had a different effect/wording on divine pride database  My bad


Edited by CadburyChocolate, 22 February 2017 - 01:56 AM.

  • 0

#6 Nirvanna21

Nirvanna21

    They pay me to post.

  • Members
  • 9553 posts
  • LocationNew Zealand
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 22 February 2017 - 12:41 AM

To be fair, iRO's description was correct and clear. the doubt arouse when someone saw that the cards had a different effect/wording on divine pride database

 

In this case it was an error, there is a rather large difference between magical fire damage and magical damage dealt to fire targets.


  • 1

#7 CadburyChocolate

CadburyChocolate

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 3553 posts

Posted 22 February 2017 - 01:20 AM

In this case it was an error, there is a rather large difference between magical fire damage and magical damage dealt to fire targets.

huh? iROs description is "increase magic attack against X property monsters by 5%" which is actually correct


Edited by CadburyChocolate, 22 February 2017 - 01:55 AM.

  • 0

#8 yamasakai90

yamasakai90

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 3030 posts
  • LocationUnder the Ground
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 22 February 2017 - 01:49 AM

huh? iROs description is "increase magic attack against X property monsters by 5%" which is actually correct

 

Current iRO's description ingame... The one from divinepride will be the one you quoted.

Hiuw42e.png


  • 0

#9 CadburyChocolate

CadburyChocolate

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Members
  • 3553 posts

Posted 22 February 2017 - 01:54 AM

Current iRO's description ingame... The one from divinepride will be the one you quoted.

Hiuw42e.png

oh sorry so that's why... i was reffering to the OP on this post https://forums.warpp...andragora-card/


  • 0

#10 Tofu

Tofu

    Too Legit To Quit

  • Public Security Section 9
  • 3287 posts
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 22 February 2017 - 06:29 AM

I hope the guy with the +14 weapon can get that restored. Pretty -_-ty to be at fault for warpportal's mistake like this.
  • 0

#11 Campitor

Campitor

    Darned Forever

  • RO1 Production
  • 11063 posts
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online

Posted 22 February 2017 - 01:46 PM

That user should PM both myself and Warnhal I think we can do something for him the description will be fixed.


  • 0

#12 Nirvanna21

Nirvanna21

    They pay me to post.

  • Members
  • 9553 posts
  • LocationNew Zealand
  • Playing:Ragnarok Online
  • Server:Chaos

Posted 22 February 2017 - 02:11 PM

I hope the guy with the +14 weapon can get that restored. Pretty -_-ty to be at fault for warpportal's mistake like this.

 

Ash said from the get go he didn't believe it was the case, but that he believed Marty when he said that it was working correctly (which it was not).

 

As more items are processed, the better things will get with descriptions in the future.


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users