RRRRREEEEPPPP WWWAAAARRRRRSS!
#1
Posted 12 July 2011 - 09:59 AM
Why can't we all just get along?
#2
Posted 12 July 2011 - 10:17 AM
People actually abuse of this... o_o
#3
Posted 12 July 2011 - 10:18 AM
But haha, in this community, unlimited negatives reps is kind of crazy. At least being limited to one per day, you save that red for something... special.
#4
Posted 12 July 2011 - 10:19 AM
Not like the reputation things mean anything though. Although the recipe for accumulating rep points is fairly easy, just jump on the bandwagon and QQ about stuff that puts the game in easy mode. (pretty sure this post will hit negative rep cause I exposed a dark secret)
#5
Posted 12 July 2011 - 10:19 AM
This thread is just begining and already have -1.
People actually abuse of this... o_o
ROFL IKR?
#6
Posted 12 July 2011 - 10:28 AM
You should have said they were Pope Cookies, Budd. Everyone loves those. They're so cute.I'm pretty sure I'll hit the negatives soon with people -1 me for posting about cookies.
#7
Posted 12 July 2011 - 10:33 AM
Don't participate if you don't want.
#8
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:00 AM
#9
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:02 AM
#10
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:03 AM
Edited by Inubashiri, 12 July 2011 - 11:04 AM.
#11
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:07 AM
lol seriously though, what's the deal with these silly rep wars going on? I think it's mainly supposed to be used for agreeing disagreeing with a point of view being posted at the time. Not to gang up b/c you don't like someone in general etc. I like to think I use my neg's responsibly but some people seem to be a on rampage with wars vs others.
Why can't we all just get along?
Honestly I don't even think of negative rep'ing people that I disagree with, they're entitled to their opinion. I only ever used it (sparingly I might add) when the person was being... lets go with difficult.
Edited by Makk, 12 July 2011 - 11:07 AM.
spelling><
#12
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:09 AM
Hm. Funny. Isn't it always something like "OMG people keep abusing this system it's not fair. FYI, I voted your rep down" in every thread with some people?
But haha, in this community, unlimited negatives reps is kind of crazy. At least being limited to one per day, you save that red for something... special.
It used to only be 1 negative rep a day. I'm not sure when they changed it.
#13
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:11 AM
It is an okish measure to know if people agree with someone a lot or not, but has no significance outside of it. If someone feels they are going to be 'attacked with -1s' and cares about it, they can simply make another forum account and people won't -1 that account, unless person starts posting things people disagree with.
Reputation system is fine, you won't die for getting too much minus reputation or catch a prize for having +7865789 numbers. If you care about reputation that much, you can go make alt accounts and +1 yourself lots of times?
It's not like people is going to like you more or less, but if you feel that it is a well spent time, go on ^^,.
#14
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:13 AM
Exploit.
I sure wish you didn't post that information. Edit it, report it to CM/Mods so something can be done to fix it. But spreading it through the forums on how to do it isn't the best idea.
#15
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:17 AM
Downvoting a person's post just because you disagree/don't like them is going too far. Poor George Washington (the inventor of democracy) would be rolling in his coffin constructed of wooden teeth and cherry trees.
#16
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:19 AM
lol u hav 516 rep. and people vote u down cuz they think its funny.
I guess I could have thousands of reputation if I spent my time worrying about it instead of posting about clearance and archbishops over and over. But what is the point of giving yourslef +1 or -1s? xP
Talking about archbishops:
I really hope Heim or Oda whoever is watching maintenance tonight can make clearance usable on anyone. He promissed a clearance usable on anyone like two months ago, but then forgot about adding all those nice changes for bishops
Edited by Kadnya, 12 July 2011 - 11:21 AM.
#17
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:19 AM
Dense much?lol u hav 516 rep. and people vote u down cuz they think its funny.
#18
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:20 AM
Edited by Oda, 12 July 2011 - 11:31 AM.
#19
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:21 AM
#20
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:23 AM
The system as it is is pretty broken. Ostensibly the downvote would be for awful trolls, offensive posts and things that violate the forum rules.
Downvoting a person's post just because you disagree/don't like them is going too far. Poor George Washington (the inventor of democracy) would be rolling in his coffin constructed of wooden teeth and cherry trees.
The Greeks invented democracy, specifically in Athens 500 B.C.
#21
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:27 AM
Y'know, just saiyan.
The "don't post what people disagree with or create a new forum account" doesn't sound like democracy, it sounds like mob mentality.
Giving a -1 is like giving a bad review to a restaurant without saying what you didn't like about it-it takes no effort and no thought. Downvoting posts that don't even have something you don't like in it simply because of the person posting is bad form as well.
#22
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:27 AM
The Greeks invented democracy, specifically in Athens 500 B.C.
I swear you sound like Sera, Spewing ridiculously specific and little known factoids at every chance.
#23
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:29 AM
I swear you sound like Sera, Spewing ridiculously specific and little known factoids at every chance.
#24
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:32 AM
Incidentally, a peanut is neither a pea nor a nut; it is a bean.
#25
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:42 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users