Announcing: Dragon Saga
#326
Posted 21 October 2010 - 07:02 AM
When it comes to copyrighted names, it only matters when the companies are competing in the same market.
For example:
Coke vs Koke. Visually similar and audibly the same. The product is also similar and competing in the same market. We may have a problem here.
But when there's two companies called Lexus, one being the car company and another being a computer software company. There is no competition between these businesses. They are offering different services, therefore not competing with one another in the same market. There should be no issue here.
So even if a musician goes by "Dragonica", there shouldbe no issue to continue calling our game "Dragonica" as well.
As far as my credibility goes, I've taken a few law classes.
I'm not a lawyer or anything so I'm not asserting that I am right (which means I could also be wrong).
I'm just trying to bring up a point because there may be no need for a name change.
#327
Posted 21 October 2010 - 07:14 AM
Okay, I think this is important so I hope some one with authority reads this and looks more into this issue.
When it comes to copyrighted names, it only matters when the companies are competing in the same market.
For example:
Coke vs Koke. Visually similar and audibly the same. The product is also similar and competing in the same market. We may have a problem here.
But when there's two companies called Lexus, one being the car company and another being a computer software company. There is no competition between these businesses. They are offering different services, therefore not competing with one another in the same market. There should be no issue here.
So even if a musician goes by "Dragonica", there shouldbe no issue to continue calling our game "Dragonica" as well.
As far as my credibility goes, I've taken a few law classes.
I'm not a lawyer or anything so I'm not asserting that I am right (which means I could also be wrong).
I'm just trying to bring up a point because there may be no need for a name change.
I don't mean to sound snarky, but every reply I can come up with it sounds it. I'm going out on a limb to say that a company as large as Gravity has its own lawyer, and it's probably one with more credibility than a student who's taken a few classes. The post makes it seem like they did it just to be safe, and not fall into any legal issues/expenses.
Secondly, it's a matter of trademark law, not copyright. Copyright is for works afaik.
Not the same situation, but a good example of what has happened in the past: WWF vs WWF.
World Wrestling Federation and World Wildlife Fund are obviously not the same markets and shouldn't be confused, but they did end up fighting over similarly named websites, their trademarks and customer confusion. Obviously in an MMO vs a no-name musical artist, there probably wouldn't be an issue or confusion, but that doesn't make it any less of a potential legal matter.
tldr: legit companies cover their asses
Edited by ridicule, 21 October 2010 - 07:15 AM.
#328
Posted 21 October 2010 - 07:45 AM
I don't mean to sound snarky, but every reply I can come up with it sounds it. I'm going out on a limb to say that a company as large as Gravity has its own lawyer, and it's probably one with more credibility than a student who's taken a few classes. The post makes it seem like they did it just to be safe, and not fall into any legal issues/expenses.
Secondly, it's a matter of trademark law, not copyright. Copyright is for works afaik.
Not the same situation, but a good example of what has happened in the past: WWF vs WWF.
World Wrestling Federation and World Wildlife Fund are obviously not the same markets and shouldn't be confused, but they did end up fighting over similarly named websites, their trademarks and customer confusion. Obviously in an MMO vs a no-name musical artist, there probably wouldn't be an issue or confusion, but that doesn't make it any less of a potential legal matter.
tldr: legit companies cover their asses
To start, you don't sound snarky. You make a good arguement. Thanks for the heads up though, that made me smile. =]
Secondly, you're right. I just had a brain fart and couldn't think of the right word so I ended up saying "copyrighted names".
The examples I gave were also trademark issues, not copyright.
Good catch, and thanks.
As for the example you gave, it is similar, but I believe is a different issue.
Anyways, in the end, it's a good thing the are covering their asses for any possible lawsuits/expenses.
But I find it a bummer they had to change the name.
#329
Posted 21 October 2010 - 07:56 AM
To start, you don't sound snarky. You make a good arguement. Thanks for the heads up though, that made me smile. =]
Secondly, you're right. I just had a brain fart and couldn't think of the right word so I ended up saying "copyrighted names".
The examples I gave were also trademark issues, not copyright.
Good catch, and thanks.
As for the example you gave, it is similar, but I believe is a different issue.
Anyways, in the end, it's a good thing the are covering their asses for any possible lawsuits/expenses.
But I find it a bummer they had to change the name.
Me too. :[ Dragon Saga just doesn't have the same ring!
And I looked at it a bit more, and while it doesn't seem like something that would be eligible for a lawsuit based on trademark infringement (same with your Coke/Koke), there's still the issue of trademark dilution. Also super unlikely without the brands being famous, but hey, gotta stay safe.
#330
Posted 21 October 2010 - 08:08 AM
Me too. :[ Dragon Saga just doesn't have the same ring!
And I looked at it a bit more, and while it doesn't seem like something that would be eligible for a lawsuit based on trademark infringement (same with your Coke/Koke), there's still the issue of trademark dilution. Also super unlikely without the brands being famous, but hey, gotta stay safe.
My thoughts exactly. ;[
#331
Posted 21 October 2010 - 10:03 AM
#332
Posted 21 October 2010 - 10:04 AM
they removed our phase 1 account
Yes..?
#333
Posted 21 October 2010 - 10:05 AM
#334
Posted 21 October 2010 - 10:07 AM
#335
Posted 21 October 2010 - 10:08 AM
#336
Posted 21 October 2010 - 01:13 PM
Working on getting an 'Ok' to post the dates for Dragon Saga Phase 2 testing, if nothing posted today, then tomorrow FOR SURE!
Edited by dango, 21 October 2010 - 01:14 PM.
#337
Posted 21 October 2010 - 01:25 PM
great news. lets hope friday at the least.calanor just twitter this:
Working on getting an 'Ok' to post the dates for Dragon Saga Phase 2 testing, if nothing posted today, then tomorrow FOR SURE!
#338
Posted 21 October 2010 - 01:28 PM
Testingcalanor just twitter this:
Dragon Saga Phase 2 testing,
#339
Posted 21 October 2010 - 02:12 PM
I don't find it unusual that saga is placed next to dragon. have you heard of people mentioning "Star War saga" ?LMAO XD Can't help it when I saw "Saga" .. Twilight Saga .. Dragon Saga ... o_o
#340
Posted 21 October 2010 - 03:48 PM
Yes haha its just the fact that Saga is used so often lolI don't find it unusual that saga is placed next to dragon. have you heard of people mentioning "Star War saga" ?
#341
Posted 21 October 2010 - 03:51 PM
"hey bill"
"hey hayden"
"whatcha playing?"
"oh you know dragon saga"
"freakin nerd!"
#342
Posted 21 October 2010 - 03:54 PM
This means nothing when you tell everyone that you are an avid powerpuff girls fanand calling it dragon saga, makes it sound really nerdy
"hey bill"
"hey hayden"
"whatcha playing?"
"oh you know dragon saga"
"freakin nerd!"
#343
Posted 22 October 2010 - 08:56 AM
http://www.xfire.com...nica/Dragonica/
#344
Posted 29 October 2010 - 12:48 PM
#345
Posted 29 October 2010 - 12:55 PM
OMG, ME WANTS!I miss Dragonica, but I'll try Saga out now. Binded my accounts. Should start up the signature thread again.
AND HI LILYKO, WELCOME BACKKKK! <3
Edited by Hawly, 29 October 2010 - 12:56 PM.
#346
Posted 29 October 2010 - 12:57 PM
#347
Posted 31 October 2010 - 01:22 PM
#348
Posted 01 November 2010 - 02:06 PM
LIIIILYYYYKOOOO!I miss Dragonica, but I'll try Saga out now. Binded my accounts. Should start up the signature thread again.
#349
Posted 16 November 2010 - 11:16 PM
Searched "Dragonica musician"
Did you mean: dragonica magician
He's a nobody artist that just has a myspace page. Dragonica is in several different countries. Why does the US version have to be called something else? Because some psychedelic artist with 6 songs has the same name?
I are mad.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users