I bet he presses view post to see what we say, anyway.
Most certainly.
Edited by to0n, 01 September 2010 - 02:05 PM.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 02:05 PM
I bet he presses view post to see what we say, anyway.
Edited by to0n, 01 September 2010 - 02:05 PM.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 02:51 PM
Posted 01 September 2010 - 03:48 PM
Dude, level 29 Knights grape people hardcore.
Edited by iKnowMyABCs, 01 September 2010 - 03:48 PM.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 05:10 PM
Yeah, you can't really tank in PvE when around others.
1. Its more about equipment, Paladins have lower agility yes, but they can still achieve a high amount of aim.
2. Damage will be increased with the patch.
3. Skip
4. Well that seems like more of aesthetic and not balancing, skip
5. If you don't want to use the unique weapons, you can always find weapons off monster drops.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 05:14 PM
IF U NEVER PLAY PALADIN THEN STFU.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 05:18 PM
IF U NEVER PLAY PALADIN THEN STFU.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 05:19 PM
IF U NEVER PLAY PALADIN THEN STFU.
to0n has a level 65 paladin.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 05:22 PM
Posted 01 September 2010 - 06:23 PM
We referred to tank as in the ability to take the damage, not actual directing all the damage to oneself. And it's mostly PvP related.Why would you want to tank anyway?
Posted 01 September 2010 - 06:27 PM
We referred to tank as in the ability to take the damage, not actual directing all the damage to oneself. And it's mostly PvP related.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 06:29 PM
Not being able to deal any damage*He's complaining about Pala not being able to take dmg? It's still absurd...
Posted 01 September 2010 - 06:36 PM
Not being able to deal any damage*
Posted 01 September 2010 - 06:37 PM
And insanely high def. Yes, that is why I called them tanks.Why want everything when you already have 50% block rate?
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:10 PM
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:19 PM
I though I answered this already.I will alter my complaints slightly because it has been addressed that most of my complaints are taken care of in the patch, so here is what my complaints are...
strength needs to be more useful, and tanking should not be a BAD thing in pve
I don't understand why you make a tank class when tanking is terrible for pve (and, arguably, its not even the best tank) seriously it just brings the rank wayyy down and makes it so you don't get the items/exp boost you are most likely doing the mission map for...so maybe have some sort of aggro aspect in this game where certain actions make the boss target a certain person and then if the boss targets only that person for X amount of hits the rank starts to go up...idk just an idea cause I have noticed I am very useless in PvE currently
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:23 PM
I think you misunderstand, I want tanking to be GOOD in pve, not altering the clan balance or anything...and add some sort of aggro tooI though I answered this already.
barunson didn't want a conventional MMO where warriors tank dmg, mage nukes, theif/hunters dps.
They wanted to balance each class so they didn't have a special class.
Or so I've read during the beta phases of DO.
Edited by Hitogoroshi, 01 September 2010 - 08:24 PM.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:28 PM
I think you misunderstand, I want tanking to be GOOD in pve, not altering the clan balance or anything...and add some sort of aggro too
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:32 PM
then why would they make a class with high hp and high defense and nothing else going for it really? well, maybe they addressed that in the patch too but it sounds like if pala's have highest hp, highest def and good damage (supposedly) they would be a little OP in both aspects of the gameI think you missed my point.
Barunson didn't intend warriors to tank or any class to tank for that matter.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:38 PM
then why would they make a class with high hp and high defense and nothing else going for it really? well, maybe they addressed that in the patch too but it sounds like if pala's have highest hp, highest def and good damage (supposedly) they would be a little OP in both aspects of the game
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:41 PM
I un-ignore you and then see this...didn't I say earlier all my complaints revolve around PvE?Warriors have nothing going else for them?
Really you need to play this game more. Warriors have A LOT going for them.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:43 PM
I un-ignore you and then see this...didn't I say earlier all my complaints revolve around PvE?
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:46 PM
then why would they make a class with high hp and high defense and nothing else going for it really? well, maybe they addressed that in the patch too but it sounds like if pala's have highest hp, highest def and good damage (supposedly) they would be a little OP in both aspects of the game
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:46 PM
Can't resist seeing what you say? More like doesn't like missing part of conversations that might help me out somehow, but I will ignore/un-ignore as I see fitYou can't resist seeing what I post anyway.
And I already said that warriors get an extreme boost in damage post-patch.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:55 PM
Wait, why do you think everyone else thinks that it is OP?well, maybe they addressed that in the patch too but it sounds like if pala's have highest hp, highest def and good damage (supposedly) they would be a little OP in both aspects of the game
Edited by Slayze, 01 September 2010 - 08:55 PM.
Posted 01 September 2010 - 09:00 PM
Is this a shooter broskie?Wait, why do you think everyone else thinks that it is OP?
People do want some of their stats to get nerfed, after their damage got buffed in the Paris patch.
And if the game isn't based on tanking, you think it's a good idea to make tanking useful?
Is it realistic to see people "pumping stat points in HP" and standing in front of their teammates in a shooter game?
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users